1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dsp73
3 years ago
11

Consider the given data. x 0 2 4 6 9 11 12 15 17 19 y 5 6 7 6 9 8 8 10 12 12 Use the least-squares regression to fit a straight

line to the given data. Along with the slope and intercept, compute the standard error of the estimate and the correlation coefficient. Repeat the problem, but regress x versus y—that is, switch the variables. Interpret your results. (Round the final answers to four decimal places.) Least-squares regression: y versus x B

Mathematics
1 answer:
levacccp [35]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

See below

Step-by-step explanation:

By using the table 1 attached (See Table 1 attached)

We can perform all the calculations to express both, y as a function of x or x as a function of y.

Let's make first the line relating y as a function of x.

<u>y as a function of x </u>

<em>(y=response variable, x=explanatory variable) </em>

\bf y=m_{yx}x+b_{yx}

where

\bf m_{yx} is the slope of the line

\bf b_{yx} is the y-intercept

In this case we use these formulas:

\bf m_{yx}=\frac{(\sum y)(\sum x)^2-(\sum x)(\sum xy)}{n\sum x^2-(\sum x)^2}

\bf b_{yx}=\frac{n\sum xy-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{n(\sum x^2)-(\sum x)^2}

n = 10 is the number of observations taken (pairs x,y)

<u>Note:</u> <em>Be careful not to confuse  </em>

\bf \sum x^2 with \bf (\sum x)^2

Performing our calculations we get:

\bf m_{yx}=\frac{(83)(95)^2-(95)(923)}{10*1277-(95)^2}=176.6061

\bf b_{yx}=\frac{10*923-(95)(83)}{10(1277)-(95)^2}=0.3591

So the equation of the line that relates y as a function of x is

<h3>y = 176.6061x + 0.3591 </h3>

In order to compute the standard error \bf S_{yx}, we must use Table 2 (See Table 2 attached) and use the definition

\bf s_{yx}=\sqrt{\frac{(y-y_{est})^2}{n}}

and we have that standard error when y is a function of x is

\bf s_{yx}=\sqrt{\frac{39515985}{10}}=1987.8628

Now, to find the line that relates x as a function of y, we simply switch the roles of x and y in the formulas.  

So now we have:

x as a function of y

(x=response variable, y=explanatory variable)

\bf x=m_{xy}y+b_{xy}

where

\bf m_{xy} is the slope of the line

\bf b_{xy} is the x-intercept

In this case we use these formulas:

\bf m_{xy}=\frac{(\sum x)(\sum y)^2-(\sum y)(\sum xy)}{n\sum y^2-(\sum y)^2}

\bf b_{xy}=\frac{n\sum xy-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{n(\sum y^2)-(\sum y)^2}

n = 10 is the number of observations taken (pairs x,y)

<u>Note:</u> <em>Be careful not to confuse  </em>

\bf \sum y^2 with \bf (\sum y)^2

Remark:<em> </em><em>If you wanted to draw this line in the classical style (the independent variable on the horizontal axis), you would have to swap the axis X and Y) </em>

Computing our values, we get

\bf m_{xy}=\frac{(95)(83)^2-(83)(923)}{10*743-(83)^2}=1068.1072

\bf b_{xy}=\frac{10*923-(95)(83)}{10(743)-(83)^2}=2.4861

and the line that relates x as a function of y is

<h3>x = 1068.1072y + 2.4861 </h3>

To find the standard error \bf S_{xy} we use Table 3 (See Table 3 attached) and the formula

\bf s_{xy}=\sqrt{\frac{(x-x_{est})^2}{n}}

and we have that standard error when y is a function of x is

\bf s_{xy}=\sqrt{\frac{846507757}{10}}=9200.5856

<em>In both cases the correlation coefficient r is the same and it can be computed with the formula: </em>

\bf r=\frac{\sum xy}{\sqrt{(\sum x^2)(\sum y^2)}}

Remark: <em>This formula for r is only true if we assume the correlation is linear. The formula does not hold for other kind of correlations like parabolic, exponential,..., etc. </em>

Computing the correlation coefficient :

\bf r=\frac{923}{\sqrt{(1277)(743)}}=0.9478

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer.
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

February 15 a.m

Step-by-step explanation:

It is the highest bar in the graph

8 0
3 years ago
I) Find the first 4 terms in the expansion of
Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:

(i)  64+192 x^2+240 x^4+160x^6

(ii) 1072

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Part (i)</u>

Using Binomial series formula:

(2+x^2)^6=2^6+6C1 \cdot 2^{6-1}\cdot x^2+6C2 \cdot 2^{6-2}\cdot(x^2)^2+6C3 \cdot 2^{6-3}\cdot(x^2)^3

              =64+6 \cdot 32\cdot x^2+15 \cdot 16\cdot x^4+20 \cdot 8 \cdot x^6

              =64+192 x^2+240 x^4+160x^6

<u>Part (ii)</u>

<u />(1-\frac{3}{x^2})^2=(1-\frac{3}{x^2})(1-\frac{3}{x^2})

               =1-\dfrac{6}{x^2}+\dfrac{9}{x^4}

(2+x^2)^6(1-\frac{3}{x^2})^2=(64+192 x^2+240 x^4+160x^6)\left(1-\dfrac{6}{x^2}+\dfrac{9}{x^4} \right)

=64-\dfrac{384}{x^2}+\dfrac{576}{x^4}+192x^2-1152+\dfrac{1728}{x^2}+240x^4-1440x^2+2160+...

There is no need to keep expanding since the remaining will include the variable.

Therefore, the term independent of x = 64 - 1152 + 2160 = 1072

6 0
3 years ago
Which polynomial function could be represented by the graph below?
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

third answer

Step-by-step explanation:

The end behavior of the function indicates that the leading coefficient of x is negative (as x approaches infinity, f(x) approaches negative infinity for cubic functions with negative leading coefficients). This eliminates the first 2 answers. Next, factor out the common factor from the 3rd answer and set it to 0 to see if the roots of the polynomial shown on the graph (x=-3, x=2) match that of the answer.

  • factor out -2x since each term in the 3rd answer is divisible by -2x => -2x(x^2+x-6)
  • set the factored polynomial equal to 0 => -2x(x^2+x-6)
  • divide both sides by -2x => 0 = x^2+x-6
  • factor => (x+3)(x-2) = 0
  • find zeros by setting both factors equal to 0 => x=-3, x=2

This means that the 3rd answer is correct. The last answer, while having the correct leading coefficient, will produce roots of 3 and -2 instead of -3 and 2, which is shown on the graph.

6 0
3 years ago
Solve the system of equations.<br><br><br> y+4z=0<br> 4x+y-2z=2<br> -3x-3z=-9
antoniya [11.8K]

Step-by-step explanation:

y+4z=0

4x+y-2z=2

-3x-3z=-9

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I'm too lazy to do my math homework
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

Hello!!! Princess Sakura here ^^

Step-by-step explanation:

So since you are too lazy I assume that you already know what to do and you just don't want to do it so I don't think you'll need any explaining right?

X:       -5           -1              0              1

_______________________________

Y:       -32         -8            -2               4

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the formula for finding the perimeter of one side of a square, please explain/walk me through it with an example ∩ ∩
    8·1 answer
  • Which graph shows a solution to the following system?<br>{ x -y ≥ -1<br>{ x+y ≤ 0​
    7·1 answer
  • Solve x3 = 125 over 27.
    7·2 answers
  • 2x - y = 0 x + y = 9 <br> What’s are the coordinates to this equation?
    11·1 answer
  • Point E is located at (–1, 1). Which of the following choices contain end points of the line segment that has E as its midpoint?
    12·1 answer
  • The prime factorization of 48 is
    14·1 answer
  • What does it mean for two angels form a vertical pair
    8·1 answer
  • Joel ordered a set of beads. He received 40 beads, and 60% of them were blue and 40% of them are green. How many blue beads did
    12·1 answer
  • Can anyone tell me what the answer is plz
    11·2 answers
  • HELP DUE AT 8: 30 ASAP!
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!