Answer:
I would agree more with Amos' opinion, thinking that most of the plant's energy ends up in the grasshopper.
Explanation:
In food chains, the flow of energy that occurs from one organism to another, from the producer to the tertiary or quaternary consumer. The amount of energy that can be transferred from one level to another is only 10%, with herbivorous animals taking up more of the energy that a producer has.
According to this, <em>it is logical to think like Amos, since the grasshopper -a primary or herbivorous consumer- will take advantage of more energy contained in the plant, with respect to the consumers of the higher levels</em>.
Learn more:
Energy and nutrients in an ecosystem brainly.com/question/8101088
I got shot in the balls in the Hebrew morning and I got shot in the balls and green balls in my head lol I was in the balls and green balls in my pants lol I was going on the same but I’m going on a little later than that I got a little green balls in the
Answer:
I don't know how to do this. But I'll explain catalysts using these words as keywords.
Explanation:
Catalysts don't increase activation energy. they lower the activation energy. they are recyclable as they are not consumed in reactions. they accelerate the rate of the chemical reaction.
