1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naily [24]
3 years ago
11

After observing the F2 generation what conclusion did Mendel come to?

Biology
1 answer:
Aneli [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The recessive trait reappeared about 25% of the time

Explanation:

There were no short plants in the F1 generation, although one of the parents was short. However, the characteristics reappeared in its original form in 1/4 of the F2 plants. He concluded that each hereditary characteristic is determined by two contrasting hereditary factors.

You might be interested in
The attic Fox is blue-gray in the summer and white in the winter. What most likely influences this change?
Fantom [35]
The answer would be D I believe:)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help? I really need it ​
Scrat [10]

Answer:

Pretty sure it’s centromere sorry if I’m late Ik quizzes is timed :(

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which best describes pnf stretching?
Viktor [21]
The answer to the question is letter d
7 0
4 years ago
A scientist finds what she thinks is a new species of rodent on a small Pacific island. However, some similar-looking rodents in
nasty-shy [4]
The answer to the given question above would be the second option. Based on the given scenario above, the reason why the new rodent with the nearby rodents and gets viable but infertile offspring is that the <span>new rodents probably derive from fairly recent ancestors that experienced dispersive allopatric speciation. Hope this helps.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Supreme Court rule that police must inform criminal suspects of their legal rights upon their arrest in which case?
ra1l [238]

Answer;

B. Miranda v. Arizona

Explanation;

The Miranda rights also called the Miranda warning stemmed or originated from a 1966 Supreme Court case: Miranda v. Arizona.

These rights are type of notifications customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody advising them of their right to silence; in other words, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials.

The objective of these notification is  to protect the admissibility of the criminals statements made during custodial interrogation in later criminal proceedings.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Derek met with an accident that caused severe damage to his cerebellum. in the context of the organization of the brain, derek i
    7·1 answer
  • 3 How did they determine the age of the houses or dwellings?
    7·2 answers
  • A company develops a new antibiotic. When the antibiotic is first used, it kills nearly all the bacteria.
    8·1 answer
  • How did you classify the materials?​
    14·2 answers
  • A plant with white flowers is crossed with a plant with red flowers. Some of the offspring have pink flowers. This is an example
    8·2 answers
  • What is a mouse a predator a prey or a producer
    12·2 answers
  • Describe one way that a decrease in species diversity can affect an ecosystem
    12·1 answer
  • What makes one appliance more efficient than another model of the same appliance?
    11·1 answer
  • How are genes different from alleles?
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER BEFORE 2PM C JUNE 8TH, 2021. Four students were trying to apply their knowledge of cell theory to scenarios outsid
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!