Answer:
A bond portfolio and a stock portfolio both provided an unrealized pretax return of 8% to a taxable investor. If the stocks paid no dividends, we know that the ________.
The after-tax return of the stock portfolio was higher than the after-tax return of the bond portfolio.
Explanation:
The returns from the bond portfolio are taxed at the corporate rate while returns from stock investments are taxed at a lower rate. It is well-known that the risks from stock are higher than the risks from bonds. As a result, the stock investments always attract higher returns and less tax, as the investor can postpone the tax for a longer term. Again, stock investments can be for the long-term unlike bonds that have defined periods.
It is called <span>Stratified Sampling :)</span>
Answer:
c. Ending inventory will be lower if Blake uses weighted average than if FIFO were used
Explanation:
To check which answer is correct, we simply evaluate each option step by step.
<u>Option A</u>
Gross margin is the difference between selling price and cost.
Under FIFO gross margin is $14. (32 -18 =14)
Under LIFO gross margin is $13. (32-19 = 13)
Thus statement is incorrect as gross margin is higher if FIFO is used.
<u />
<u>Option B</u>
If FIFO is used, the dollar amount of ending inventory will be $19 as ending inventory will contain product purchased later that is at $19. In contrast, if LIFO is used, the dollar amount of ending inventory will be $18. Thus the statement becomes incorrect that it will be the same.
<u />
<u>Option C</u>
The ending inventory under FIFO is $19.
The ending inventory under LIFO is $18
The endng inventory under AVCO or weighted average will be, 18+19 / 2 = 18.5
Thus the statement is correct as the ending inventory under weighted average $18.5 is lower than ending inventory under FIFO $19. So, C is the correct Answer.
Answer:
<em>Purchasing power parity (PPP): </em>The principle suggests that if the purchasing powers are the same in two different countries, their exchange rates would be in equilibrium.
<em>Happening:</em> When inflation occurs in the US and it occurs more rapidly than in other nations, the currency, the dollar, will be less attractive to other nations. This means that the dollar's exchange rate with the currency of another nation will increase.
Explanation:
Suppose the rate of exchange between pound and dollar is 1 pound= 1.5 dollar before inflation. When inflation happens it may be 1 pound= 2 dollars.
If it has greater buying power, the currency will be demanded more. The US dollar was more requested before inflation, as 1 pound is spent on buying just $1.5. When inflation occurs, the dollar's buying power goes down and it gets less needed. 1 pound is already being spent on that time but to buy more dollars, 2 dollars.
The answer is sunk cost
This incurred cost usually could not be recovered in any way.
For example, let's say for the business operation, you make a prepaid rent for a building for the whole year.
In this situation, the prepaid rent could be considered as a sunk cost because it's already incurred and not recoverable anymore
