D is the correct answer.
0.25 is rational because it can be represented as a ratio of integers (1/4).
0.45 is rational because it can also be represented as a ratio of integers (9/20).
When you multiply rational numbers, you always end up with a rational number.
0.25*0.45=0.1125 or 1125/10000
Answer:
$40
Step-by-step explanation:
30% = .30
$12/0.30 = 40
[RevyBreeze]
To be similar ratios of the corresponding sides should be constant.
|UV|/|EO| = 8/4=2/1
|VL|/|OG| = 4/2=2/1
|LU|/|GE| = 6/3 = 2/1
So,all three corresponding pair of these triangles UVL and EOG are in proportion, so ΔUVL and ΔEOG are similar.
Because ΔUVL and ΔEOG are similar, their corresponding angles are congruent.
m∠U=m∠E
m∠V=m∠O
m∠L=m∠G.
Answer:
1. 13 or -13
2. -5 < y < -3
3. 6 or -6
4. 1/8 or -1/8
Step-by-step explanation:
Clear the absolute-value bars by splitting the equation into its two cases, one for the Positive case and the other for the Negative case.
The Absolute Value term is |x|
For the Negative case we'll use -(x)
For the Positive case we'll use (x)
Step 3 :
Solve the Negative Case
-(x) = 13
Multiply
-x = 13
Multiply both sides by (-1)
x = -13
Which is the solution for the Negative Case
Step 4 :
Solve the Positive Case
(x) = 13
Which is the solution for the Positive Case
Step 5 :
Wrap up the solution
x=-13
x=13
But for the case of question (2) its a different pattern..
Since this is a "less than" absolute-value inequality, my first step is to clear the absolute value according to the "less than" pattern. Then I'll solve the linear inequality.
| y + 4 | < 1
–1 < y + 4 < 1
This is the pattern for "less than". Continuing, I'll subtract 3 from all three "sides" of the inequality:
–1 – 4 < y + 4 - 4 < 1 – 4
–5 < y < -3

The solution to the original absolute-value inequality, | y + 4 | < 1 , is the interval:

Answer:
33k - 15
Step-by-step explanation:
=> 8k-5(-5k+3)
=> 8k+25k-15
=> 33k - 15