Answer:
It's 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
It's closer to 0 than the other fractions
First, find the relationship of the circumference to its diameter by finding that the length of the diameter wraps around the length of the circumference approximately π times. Use this relationship to writing an equation showing the ratio of circumference to diameter equaling π. Then rearrange the equation to solve for the circumference. Substitute the diameter for 2 times the radius
I think it could be 13,17, and 15.
If I am wrong then I am sorry
Trigonometry can be used to find angles and sides of simple triangles. If an 18-foot ladder touches a building 14 feet up the wall then the angle can be deduced by trigonometry. In this case, the ladder defines the hypotenuse (H) of the triangle and the wall defines the opposite (O) side of the triangle. Therefore we can use the equation theta=sin^-1(O/H) . This yields an angle of 51 degrees.
<h3>
Answer: 2.8</h3>
=======================================================
Explanation:
Multiply each visit count with their corresponding frequency.
Examples:
- 0*12 = 0 for the first row.
- 1*366 = 366 for the second row
- 2*53 = 106 for the third row
and so on...
I recommend making a third column like this
![\begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \cline{1-3}\text{Visits} & \text{Frequency} & \text{Visits*Frequency}\\\cline{1-3}0 & 12 & 0\\\cline{1-3}1 & 366 & 366\\\cline{1-3}2 & 53 & 106\\\cline{1-3}3 & 52 & 156\\\cline{1-3}4 & 155 & 620\\\cline{1-3}5 & 243 & 1215\\\cline{1-3}\end{array}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7B%7Cc%7Cc%7Cc%7C%7D%20%5Ccline%7B1-3%7D%5Ctext%7BVisits%7D%20%26%20%5Ctext%7BFrequency%7D%20%26%20%5Ctext%7BVisits%2AFrequency%7D%5C%5C%5Ccline%7B1-3%7D0%20%26%2012%20%26%200%5C%5C%5Ccline%7B1-3%7D1%20%26%20366%20%26%20366%5C%5C%5Ccline%7B1-3%7D2%20%26%2053%20%26%20106%5C%5C%5Ccline%7B1-3%7D3%20%26%2052%20%26%20156%5C%5C%5Ccline%7B1-3%7D4%20%26%20155%20%26%20620%5C%5C%5Ccline%7B1-3%7D5%20%26%20243%20%26%201215%5C%5C%5Ccline%7B1-3%7D%5Cend%7Barray%7D)
That way you can keep track of all the results in an organized way.
Then add everything in the third column
0+366+106+156+620+1215 = 2463
Divide this sum over the total frequency (12+366+53+52+155+243 = 881) and we'll get the mean
2463/881 = 2.7956867
Rounding to one decimal place gets us to 2.8 as the final answer.
-------------
The much longer way to do this is to imagine 12 copies of "0", 366 copies of "1", 53 copies of "2", and so on. We'll have an extremely large data set of 881 items inside it. As you can see, this second method is definitely not recommended to actually carry out. Rather it's helpful to have this as a thought experiment to see why we revert to multiplication instead.
Eg: Imagine adding 155 copies of "4". A shortcut is to simply say 4*155 = 620