ANSWER: CRITICAL LISTENING
EXPLANATION:
Critical listening refers to the form of listening that involves analysis, indebt thinking and making judgment.
However, critical listening occurs when an individual want to comprehend what is being said by the other person, but simultaneously have some responsibility or reason to evaluate what the speaker is saying and the manner it's being said.
Critical listening helps in assumptions evaluation, and other important information during the interaction. In critical listening, the listener undertakes systematic thinking and reasoning, and this allows the listener to derive whether there's any evidence in the speaker’s speech. Persons with critical listening do not use their opinions to adhere to arguments that are proved to be illogical. They establish facts to evaluate the argument put forth by the speaker, rather than mere opinions. Hence, it involves making a decision in problem-solving procedures.
Conclusively, a person with critical thinking skills are capable of making good decisions in proffering solutions to problems. Hence, these skills helps to increase productivity, laying emphasis on how critical listening plays a vital role during communication.
According to the structural-functional approach, the one that considered as a direct benefit of disengagement from work is: It allows the next generation to transition into jobs.
Especially when a worker became too old for his job, it would be really beneficial if they start to train a younger potential replacement for him when his retirement time come.
Answer:
Visual/spatial Learner
Explanation:
People who fall under the classification of visual/spatial learners, absorb, perceive, analyze and understand VISUAL information around them, and capture concepts with what their eyes picture.
These kind of learners take information the best when is written, modeled or diagrammed, through a visual media. And have good hand-eye coordination, and memorization of details.
Jesse designs and plays with machines, thus most likely follows and draws diagrams, plays with logic puzzles that need analyzing with the eyes, and he has an ease with maps, so Jesse is more a visual person than an auditory for example.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
Predicting behavior
Explanation:
Predicting behavior in psychology helps to have insight to human behavior that has not undergone test,it gives insight of the underlying reasons behind of human actions. Sometimes psychologist make use of "predictive model" in acheiving these.
It should be noted that the goal of psychology that researcher focused when psychologist are interested in studying the risk factors that lead to delinquency in adolescence, is Predicting behavior
