I believe the answer is Monopolist.
Answer:
This means that receiving 9000 today is better for us as we will have more at the end of 6 years.
Explanation:
We need to first calculate what is the future value of payments in both scenarios. If we receive $9,000 today and invest it at 10% for 6 years we will have 9000*1.10^6=15,944
If we start reviving cash in 4 annual payments 2 years from now of $3000 we will have to find the future value of each individual payment and add them up.
First payment Future value = 3000*1.10^4=4392 (Money can be invested for 4 years at 10%)
Second payment future value = 3000*1.10^3=3993 (Money can be invested for 3 years at 10%)
Third payment future value = 3000*1.10^2=3630 (Money can be invested for 4 years at 10%)
Fourth payment future value = 3000*1.1=3300
Add them all up = 15315
This means that receiving 9000 today is better for us as we will have more at the end of 6 years.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Development of brownfields in urban areas.
Explanation:
In urban planning, sustainable development refers to continuous activities that can be performed during extended periods of time. They are the result of repeated patterns of individuals who, sometimes unconsciously, provoke more and more individuals to repeat their actions.
Under such a scenario, <em>the development of brownfields in urban areas is the result of building more department complexes in the cities because of the increasing need for renting and selling houses as a result of the increasing population growth.</em>
Answer:
Net purchases:
= Purchases - Purchase Returns and Allowances - Purchase Discount
= 500,000 - 14,000 - 9,000
= $477,000
Cost of goods sold:
= Net purchase + Freight-in
= 477,000 + 15,000
= $492,000
Answer:
c. No; the facts of this situation do not provide reasonable grounds for a stop and search. Any attempt to do so by store security could result in a claim of false imprisonment.
Explanation:
According to the situation described in the question above, store security has no right to stop and search for Jeff. Therefore, the letter c is the most correct answer to this question.
Jeff's actions in the store do not provide sufficient reasons for there to be any kind of stop and research, as the facts in the situation do not provide enough information about an illegal act, so if store security forces a situation there could be legal damage to the store .
Therefore, it is essential that stores adopt a theft prevention strategy, with an effective security system and a team prepared to carry out correct approaches.
