What can 45/8 be simplified down to?

The amount Lin's sister earns at her part-time job is proportional to the number

gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

$y = 9.6x$

Yes, y is a function of x.

$x = \frac{5}{48} y$

Step-by-step explanation:

For a proportional relation, the equation is given by:

$y = kx$

where k is the unit rate of change.

We were told that, Lin's sister earns $9.6 per hour.

This means k=9.6.

We substitute to get:

$y = 9.6x$

We could rewrite this as

$y(x) = 9.6x$

Yes, y is a function of x.

To obtain an equation describing x as a function of y, we solve for x to get:

$x = \frac{1}{9.6} y$

6 0

2 years ago

Please help

mafiozo [28]

Answer:

Easy it's a right hand child

Step-by-step explanation:

Because if both husband and wife both have right hands. And it's 10% chance the child will be left handed. Then it's possible that the child is going to be a right hand.

4 0

2 years ago

So, I undestood slope right. But, I get confused with the other points that intersect there is multiple of them. How do i look f

ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

slope = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Find 2 points on the line that land perfectly on the grid. I'll choose these 2 here:

(-2, -1) and (0, 3)

Rise is the change in the y value from one point to the other, and run is the change in the x. Looking at these 2 points, y went from -1 to 3. That is a <em>rise</em> of 4. The x went from -2 to 0, so that is a <em>run</em> of 2. "rise over run" means rise literally over run in a fraction like this:

$m=\frac{rise}{run}$

The more proper way to calculate slope looks like this, but it's really the same thing in the end:

$m=\frac{y2-y1}{x2-x1}$

where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are your 2 points.

Finally, the slope of this line is:

$m=\frac{3--1}{0--2}\\\\m=\frac{4}{2}\\\\m=2$

That's a rise of 4 over a run of 2, and that simplifies to just a slope of 2.

8 0

2 years ago

The mayor of a town has proposed a plan for the annexation of an adjoining community. A political study took a sample of 900 vot

Stells [14]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.75 -0.72}{\sqrt{\frac{0.72(1-0.72)}{900}}}=2.00$

Now we can calculate the p value. Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v= P(Z>2) =0.0228$

Since the p value is lower than the significance level of 0.05 we have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion of residents favored annexation is higher than 0.72 or 72%

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

n=900 represent the random sample selected

$\hat p=0.75$ estimated proportion of residents favored annexation

$p_o=0.72$ is the value that we want to test

represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

$p_v$ represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

The political strategist wants to test the claim that the percentage of residents who favor annexation is above 72%.:

Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.72$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.72$

The statistic for this case is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

Replacing the data given we got:

$z=\frac{0.75 -0.72}{\sqrt{\frac{0.72(1-0.72)}{900}}}=2.00$

Now we can calculate the p value. Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v= P(Z>2) =0.0228$

Since the p value is lower than the significance level of 0.05 we have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion of residents favored annexation is higher than 0.72 or 72%

3 0

2 years ago

How would the expression x^3+64 be rewritten using sum off cubes

Mamont248 [21]

$\bf \textit{difference of cubes}
\\ \quad \\
a^3+b^3 = (a+b)(a^2-ab+b^2)\qquad
(a+b)(a^2-ab+b^2)= a^3+b^3 \\ \quad \\
a^3-b^3 = (a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)\qquad
(a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)= a^3-b^3\\\\
-------------------------------\\\\
\boxed{64=4^3}\qquad x^3+64\implies x^3+4^3\implies (x+4)(x^2-x4+4^2)
\\\\\\
(x+4)(x^2-4x+16)$

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers