<em />It is true that arbitration places a dispute before a third party for a binding settlement.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Income tax is a tax imposed by the government on the income earned by the individuals. This income can be from capital and labor. It creates a deadweight loss in the market for labor and capital.
Deadweight loss is the loss to economic efficiency and production caused by a tax. The imposition of a tax creates a tax wedge, this tax wedge leads to a deadweight loss. Deadweight loss due to income tax is the loss of purchasing power or reductions standard of living due to tax.
The inefficiency or tax burden depends upon the elasticities of demand and supply. Whoever has the least elasticity will share most of the tax burden.
Answer:
a. Adjusted Gross income is calculated as;
= Wages + Interest - Deduction
= 41,000 + 700 - 5,000
= $36,700
b. The couple will pick their Standard deduction in 2019 because its more than the itemized deduction.
Standard deduction for couples in 2019 = $24,400
c. I assume you mean their 2019 taxable income which is;
= Adjusted Gross income - Standard deduction
= 36,700 - 24,400
= $12,300
<em>Note; As of 2018 there are no more personal deductions. </em>
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
