171 19/32=(171×32+19)/32=(odd number)/32.
But 32=2⁵
Thus, this ratio cannot be simplified, because the numerator is an odd number.
And the denominator is a power of 2.
I’m not sure if this is right but f(x) = 1/x + 3/2 ?
Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:

The alternative hypothesis is:

If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Answer:
D. 60, 60, 60
Step-by-step explanation:
In an equilateral triangle, all sides are equal and equal to 180 when added together. because 60×3 is equal to 180, D is the right answer. I hope this helps you!
Answer:110
Step-by-step explanation:x^2+17x=15x+35
x^2+17x-15x-35=0
x^2+2x-35=0
delta=2^2-4*1*(-35)=4+140=144
x1=(-2+V144)/2=(-2+12)/2=10/2
x=5
so 15*5+35=75+35=110