All categories

3 years ago

Three divide eigthteen

Mathematics

2 answers:

serious [3.7K]3 years ago

5 0

The answer is 18÷3 = 6

garri49 [273]3 years ago

3 0

3 ÷ 18 = $\frac{3}{18} = \frac{1}{6}$ <em>after fraction is reduced</em>

Answer: $\frac{1}{6}$

You might be interested in

The school council was having a bake sale. Jaime purchased a brownie for $0.75, a

Ghella [55]

Answer: the answer is 2.75 because

Step-by-step explanation: 1.25+0.75+0.75=2.75 hope i Helped mark me as brainliest

4 0

2 years ago

Beth bought 4 yards of ribbon. how many inches of ribbon does beth have?

wariber [46]

Beth has 144 inches of ribbon.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A line passes through the point (-5, 2) and has a slope of 3.

ELEN [110]

Answer:

y-2=3(x+5)

Step-by-step explanation:

so point slope form is y-y1=m(x-x1)

x1 and y1 are your ordered pair: (-5,2)

M is the slope.

All you have to do is plug in the numbers!

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Convert 340 centimeters into inches. Round your answer to the nearest whole number.

Nana76 [90]

Answer:

isdkdwefikewsgfjyntjnt

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of t

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

This data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $\sigma_{1}^{2}$ be the variance for the population of weight gains for rats given a low dose, and $\sigma_{2}^{2}$ the variance for the population of weight gains for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide.

We want to test $H_{0}: \sigma_{1}^{2} = \sigma_{2}^{2}$ vs $H_{1}: \sigma_{1}^{2} > \sigma_{2}^{2}$ . We have that the sample standard deviation for $n_{2} = 22$ female control rats was $s_{2} = 28$ g and for $n_{1} = 18$ female low-dose rats was $s_{1} = 51$ g. So, we have observed the value

$F = \frac{s_{1}^{2}}{s_{2}^{2}} = \frac{(51)^{2}}{(28)^{2}} = 3.3176$ which comes from a F distribution with $n_{1} - 1 = 18 - 1 = 17$ degrees of freedom (numerator) and $n_{2} - 1 = 22 - 1 = 21$ degrees of freedom (denominator).

As we want carry out a test of hypothesis at the significance level of 0.05, we should find the 95th quantile of the F distribution with 17 and 21 degrees of freedom, this value is 2.1389. The rejection region is given by {F > 2.1389}, because the observed value is 3.3176 > 2.1389, we reject the null hypothesis. So, this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains.

8 0

3 years ago