1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vampirchik [111]
3 years ago
15

Within the food service industry​ (restaurants that serve meals to​ customers, but not just fast​ food), find examples of firms

that have sustained competitive advantage by competing on the basis of​ (1) cost​ leadership, (2)​ response, and​ (3) differentiation. Cite one example in each​ category; provide a sentence or two in support of each choice. ​(​Hint: A ​"99cents ​menu" is very easily copied and is not a good source of sustained​ advantage.)

Business
1 answer:
NikAS [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Answer for the question:

Within the food service industry​ (restaurants that serve meals to​ customers, but not just fast​ food), find examples of firms that have sustained competitive advantage by competing on the basis of​ (1) cost​ leadership, (2)​ response, and​ (3) differentiation. Cite one example in each​ category; provide a sentence or two in support of each choice. ​(​Hint: A ​"99cents ​menu" is very easily copied and is not a good source of sustained​ advantage.)

is given in the attachment.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Jane is an employee of Tyco, Inc. and she is in charge of payroll. Every week she issues a check in the name of a fictitious emp
KengaRu [80]

Answer:

b. Tyco is liable because it authorized Jane to issue payroll checks.

Explanation:

There is the company responsibility to put the right person for the specific job. Here in the given situation Jane would not be a liable person for an vital position of the company. in the case when the fraud done by the employee so the firm would be liable as the company provide the authorization to the person who have to perform that job

Therefore, the option b is correct

4 0
3 years ago
Sep. 3 Purchased merchandise inventory on account from Shallin Wholesalers, $7,000. Terms 1/15, n/EOM, FOB shipping point.
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

Sep. 3

Dr Merchandise Inventory $7,000

Cr Accounts Payable—Shallin Wholesalers $7,000

Sep. 4

Dr Merchandise Inventory $55

Cr Cash $55

Sep. 4

Dr Merchandise Inventory $2,100

Cr Cash $2,100

Sep. 6

Dr Accounts Payable—Shallin Wholesalers $1,000

Cr Inventory $1,000

Sep. 8

Dr Accounts Receivable— Herenda Company $5,445

Cr Sales Revenue $5,445

Sep. 8

Dr Cost of Goods Sold $2,255

Cr Merchandise Inventory $2,255

Sep. 9

Dr Merchandise Inventory $10,000

Cr Accounts Payable—Tripp Wholesalers $10,000

Sep. 10

Dr Accounts Payable—Shallin Wholesalers $6,000

Cr Merchandise Inventory $60

Cr Cash $5,940

Sep. 12

Dr Cash $5,445

Accounts Receivable—Herenda Company $5,445

Sep. 13

Dr Accounts Payable—Tristan Wholesalers $100

Cr Merchandise Inventory $100

Sep. 15

Dr Accounts Receivable—Jesper Company $3,500

Cr Sales Revenue $3,500

Sep. 15

Dr Cost of Goods Sold $1,610

Cr Merchandise Inventory $1,610

Sep. 22

Dr Accounts Payable—Tristan Wholesalers $9,900

Cr Cash $9,900

Sep. 23

Dr Refunds Payable $800

Cr Accounts Receivable—Jesper Company $800

Sep. 23

Dr Merchandise Inventory $368

Cr Estimated Returns Inventory $368

Sep. 25

Dr Accounts Receivable—Smithson $1,995

Cr Sales Revenue $1,940

Cr Cash $55

Sep. 25

Dr Cost of Goods Sold $780

Cr Merchandise Inventory $780

Sep. 29

Dr Cash $1,995

Cr Accounts Receivable— Smithson $1,995

Sep. 30

Dr Cash $2,100

Cr Accounts Receivable—Jesper Company $2,100

Explanation:

Preparation of the journal entries

Sep. 3

Dr Merchandise Inventory $7,000

Cr Accounts Payable—Shallin Wholesalers $7,000

Sep. 4

Dr Merchandise Inventory $55

Cr Cash $55

Sep. 4

Dr Merchandise Inventory $2,100

Cr Cash $2,100

Sep. 6

Dr Accounts Payable—Shallin Wholesalers $1,000

Cr Inventory $1,000

Sep. 8

Dr Accounts Receivable— Herenda Company $5,445

Cr Sales Revenue $5,445

[$5,500-(1%*$5,500)]

Sep. 8

Dr Cost of Goods Sold $2,255

Cr Merchandise Inventory $2,255

Sep. 9

Dr Merchandise Inventory $10,000

Cr Accounts Payable—Tripp Wholesalers $10,000

Sep. 10

Dr Accounts Payable—Shallin Wholesalers $6,000

($7,000-$1,000)

Cr Merchandise Inventory $60

(1%*$6,000)

Cr Cash $5,940

($6,000-$60)

Sep. 12

Dr Cash $5,445

[$5,500-(1%*$5,500)]

Accounts Receivable—Herenda Company $5,445

Sep. 13

Dr Accounts Payable—Tristan Wholesalers $100

Cr Merchandise Inventory $100

Sep. 15

Dr Accounts Receivable—Jesper Company $3,500

Cr Sales Revenue $3,500

Sep. 15

Dr Cost of Goods Sold $1,610

Cr Merchandise Inventory $1,610

Sep. 22

Dr Accounts Payable—Tristan Wholesalers $9,900

Cr Cash $9,900

($10,000-$100)

Sep. 23

Dr Refunds Payable $800

Cr Accounts Receivable—Jesper Company $800

Sep. 23

Dr Merchandise Inventory $368

Cr Estimated Returns Inventory $368

Sep. 25

Dr Accounts Receivable—Smithson $1,995

($1,940+$55)

Cr Sales Revenue $1,940

[$2,000-(3%*$2,000)]

Cr Cash $55

Sep. 25

Dr Cost of Goods Sold $780

Cr Merchandise Inventory $780

Sep. 29

Dr Cash $1,995

($1,940+$55)

Cr Accounts Receivable— Smithson $1,995

Sep. 30

Dr Cash $2,100

Cr Accounts Receivable—Jesper Company $2,100

5 0
3 years ago
Consider relative purchasing power parity (PPP) and remember the consumer price index (CPI) provides the price level in a countr
pychu [463]

Answer:

0.7156 USD/CAD

Explanation:

Relationship between relative PPP and inflation rates can be expressed as given below:

S(1)/S(0) = (1+I(y)) / (1+I(x))................(1)

==> S(0) = spot exchange rate at the beginning of the time period

==> S(1)  = spot exchange rate at the end of the time period

==> I(y) = expected inflation rate for country y, which is foreign country

==> I(x) = expected inflation rate for country x, which is domestic country.

Here, assumes that the US is a foreign country and Canada is domestic country

I(y) = (200/165) - 1 = 21.21%

I(x) = (220/170) - 1 = 29.41%

On putting the values of I(x) and I(y) in the first equation, we get:

S(1)/0.764 = (1+0.2121) / (1+0.2941)

S(1)/0.764 = 0.9366354996

S(1) = 0.764*0.936635

S(1) = 0.7156 USD/CAD

If relative PPP holds, the spot exchange rate in 2015 will be 0.7156 USD/CAD

4 0
3 years ago
In the for-profit business world, decisions to spend money must pass a "cost versus benefit" test, but for nonprofit arts organi
Zinaida [17]

The cost versus benefit test will not act as a good factor to measure tangible achievement.      

Explanation:

Most of the Non-profit organization has a focus on welfare activities. The benefits can be influenced only by the subjective fulfillment of benefits. Executive members of all trusts are not able to calculate the benefits attained through welfare operations. Such a parameter system of identifying the beneficiaries' prospects of end-users is known as Intangible achievement.

The tangible achievement always lies in the status of invisible movements of each welfare operations. But each step of inducing the effects of cost versus benefit test does not suit to provide the effective to identify the tangible achievements.  

3 0
3 years ago
A decision-maker faces the following decision under conditions of uncertainty. This decision-maker has $1 million in assets. Mos
denis-greek [22]

A- The net earnings of the individual in question will be $710000 after the individual's claim for loss by fire is settled by the insurance company. B- Yes, he would buy the insurance if he were risk neutral.

C- Yes, the individual will buy the insurance policy if he were a expected utility maximizer as he would want to claim complete settlement of this amount to be claimed in case of fire loss.

  • The expected net earnings from the insurance after deducting the amount from the premium paid and total claim endorsed by the insurance company will be $710000 which can be shown as below

\rm Net\ earnings= claim\ received - premium\ of\ policy

\rm Net\ earnings= 750000-40000

We get,

\rm Net\ earnings= 710000

  • If the individual were risk neutral he would like to take the insurance as the risk of fire in the example given above is 0.5 which is greater than zero and this ultimately implies that <u>risk cannot be taken.</u>

  • In the case if the individual is expected utility maximizer he would take the insurance as it would not only give him the claims from losses due to fire but also help him secure his house against beta of fire.

Hence, the correct answers will be A- $710000; B- Yes.; C- Yes. and imply that taking insurance will be a wise decision by the individual.

To know more about insurance policy , click the link below.

brainly.com/question/24984403

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Blue Spruce Corp. took a physical inventory on December 31 and determined that goods costing $229,500 were on hand. Not included
    10·1 answer
  • What is the most popular gaming company?<br><br> Answer: SQUIMIX
    8·1 answer
  • Who among the following is associated with contributions to quality control in operations management? Henry Ford Charles Babbage
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about renting and owning is correct
    9·2 answers
  • Olde manufacturing, a parts supplier to the auto industry, has been using the behavioral approach to management for over 100 yea
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of party retailing?
    8·1 answer
  • A discount on bonds payable: a. Occurs when a company issues bonds with a contract rate less than the market rate. b. Occurs whe
    5·1 answer
  • A $2.00 increase in a product's variable expense per unit accompanied by a $2.00 increase in its selling price per unit will: A)
    14·1 answer
  • How will the rapo rate cut affect the economy?​
    5·1 answer
  • enterprise project management software is also known as a tool of project management software.low-end mid range high-end baselin
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!