Answer:
It's 0 I think I'm not sure (I'm sure it's 0 but That's what I always say to humble myself so)
Step-by-step explanation:
-1 is greater then 1.05 then 1.05 then 1.55
so the answer is C
Answer:
The claim made by the researcher lacks the validity on basis of reasons as indicated in the explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim made by the researcher is not valid on basis of following reasons:
- Interacting variables are not mapped accurately. The additional variables as the health status of the volunteers, eating and fitness habits are not considered in the consideration. This results in a in complete validation.
- The placebo effect is not catered accordingly. As the half of the volunteers are taking nothing, this is not the direct influence of the placebo and thus double-blinded testing for placebo effect is to be ensured in future experiments.
- The environmental effects are not considered as the effect under study is dependent on the environmental effects, thus the claim is biased and the generalization is not valid.
Width = 13cm
Length = 16cm
<u>Explanation:</u>
Let width = b,
So, length = b+3
Perimeter of rectangle = 2x(length + width)
According to the question,
Hence,
Width = 13cm
Length = 16cm
Step-by-step explanation:
so what you're going to want to do is set this equal to 0. add the 6 over. add the 30 over. subtract 16x-14x they have the same degree of power so you can do that. divide the coefficient of x over and x=12 maybe who really knows anymore