Answer:According to the article, when companies earn patents specifically to prevent competition, it hinders the innovation of products that might actually be better. For instance, Bruce Nolop describes how his company had to pay more attention to the "minefield of existing patents than on the expected value that we could bring to customers." Rosabeth Moss Kanter suggests a "use it or lose it" solution to this problem. She thinks that a company that patents an item would be forced to use the patented idea or product or risk losing the patent. This idea would encourage more competition and prevent patent abuse.
Explanation:
Answer: <em>Option (B) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
If true, the following will most seriously weakens the argument: There has been an increasing rate in store opening in the central shopping district (CSD) since Colson's have opened discount stores.
Since after Colson's opened, the locations which were vacant became stores in particular discount store which did not spar with Colson's. Now that we have a discount store & department store without discount. Therefore when these stores close while competing with SpendLess, they wont be replaced with regular non-discount stores .
Answer:
a. The shareholders will want to tender their shares.
c. The gain will be $25.31 million – $23.44 million = $1.87 million.
Explanation:
a. The value of the firm is 1.25 million shares* 15= $18.75 million.
Increase in value, 18.75*135% = $25.31 million, so now this is the value of the firm
If 50% of the shares are bought for $18.75 Million, you will buy 0.625 million shares, so the total amount that will be paid is $11.72 million.
Now, the money against shares will be borrowed as collateral. This means that the new value of the equity will be $25.31 million – $11.72 million = 13.59 million.
1.25 million shares are there so now the price of the share will be = $10.87 million ($13.59 million/$1.25 million = $ 10.87 million).
b.The price of the shares has decreased from $13.59 to $10.87 after the tender offer, everyone will want to tender their shares for $18.75.
c. Supposing everyone tenders the shares and you will buy at $18.75 per share, you will pay $23.44 (18.75 per share *1.25 million shares) to acquire the company and it will be worth $25.31 million.
The gain will be $25.31 million – $23.44 million = $1.87 million.
Answer:Net working capital = $152,500
Explanation:
Net working capital = CA– CL
Where CA= Current Assets = Cash + Inventory + Accounts Receivable
and CL= Current Liabilities= Account payable + Notes payable + accrued wages and taxes
CA=$54, 000 + $184,000 + $ 219,000 =$457,000
Current liabilities = Account payable + Notes payable + accrued wages and taxes
CL = $134,000 + $129,000 + $41,500
= $304,500
Net working capital = Current assets – Current liabilities
Net working capital = $457,000 – $304,500= $152,500
Net working capital = $152,500
Answer:
Scarcity and Utility
I will explain the concepts of scarcity, value, and utility using my laptop and some writing pens. I have only one laptop available in my family. I use it 24-hours daily. I attach so much value (utility) to the laptop because it is only one. It is very scare in my household. On the other hand, I have a packet of writing pens. Pens are relatively not scare in my household. If my laptop is missing, I will raise uproar in the house. Everybody present will answer a tedious query. But, if one of the pens gets missing, I may not even be aware that it is missing. At the moment, I do not attach much value (utility) to the writing pens because I have many of them presently . Writing pens are not scare in my household, as I said earlier.
Using these examples, I have demonstrated the concepts of scarcity, utility, and value.
Explanation:
Therefore, scarcity is defined by the value and the relative availability of a good. Scarcity is a basic economic problem that shows the gap existing between limited resources and unlimited needs. Based on the lack experienced with satisfying a need, one has to always choose between alternatives in order to maximize resource allocation and utility.
Utility in Economics refers to the value or satisfaction derivable from the meeting of a human or economic need. It is initially connected to the concept of scarcity. But after attaining some level of utility, scarcity temporarily evaporates. And this is the dividing thin line. This is why they are mostly used together. "Something that is valuable is scarce and give utility." Something that is not highly valuable is not usual scarce and does not give much utility, at least, to an extent.
