Answer: Seems like it would depend on your base. Can you pull the ladder away from the window and let it go and it drops back to the original position? I would prefer an extension ladder with a set off just below the frame so that I can reach both panes without the ladder blocking me. If the extension ladder won’t reach I would use the WFP (and might use that anyway).
1, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6, each x is one of each number below
Hey there!
Your answer is C.
If you take the lengths of the legs of the triangle, which are 12 and 4, we can multiply them by the scale factor to see what the legs of our new triangle is.
12 x 1/4 = 3
4 x 1/4 = 1
So, the legs of our new triangle have lengths of 1 and 3.
We can see that option C has the correct triangle in red.
If we're looking at the ratio of rise to run of each triangle, it is 1/3 for both the large triangle and the small triangle.
The rise for the larger triangle is 4, and the run is 12. That is 4/12, which can be simplified to 1/3.
The rise for the smaller triangle is 1, and the run is 3. That is 1/3, which is all the way simplified already.
These triangles are similar because the first one was dilated to get the second one, which explains why the ratios are the same.
Hope this helps!
Given that the first spinner has three equal sectors labelled 1, 2 and 3; and the second spinner has equal sectors labelled 3, 4, 5 and 6.
The number of possible outcomes that do not show a 1 on the first spinner is 2 (i.e. the first spinner shows 2 or 3).
The number of possible outcomes that the second spinner show the number 4 is 1 (i.e. the second spinner shows 4)
In probability, the word 'and' goes with multiplication.
Therefore, <span>the number of possible outcomes that do not show a 1 on the first spinner and show the number 4 on the second spinner</span> is given by 2 x 1 = 2 possible outcomes.
i.e. the first spinner shows the number 2 and the second spinner shows the number 4 or the first spinner shows the number 3 and the second spinner shows the number 4.
Answer:
3,000 meters
Step-by-step explanation:
recall that 1 kilometer = 1,000 meters
hence
3 kilometers = 1,000 meters x 3 = 3,000 meters
