Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.
- Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
- Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
- Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
- A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
- Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.
Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that
proves an answer in Science.
Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ9
Answer:
The correct answer is the option c)He thought the mold had released a chemical that prevented the bacteria’s growth.
Explanation:
In the 1920s, Alexander Fleming was working in his laboratory at St. Mary's Hospital in London when, almost by accident, he discovered a naturally growing substance that could attack certain bacteria. In one of his experiments, Fleming observed that colonies of a bacterium had been depleted or removed by a mold that grew on the same Petri dish. He observed that the bacteria furthest from the fungus had grown to produce large-sized colonies, while the colonies closest to the fungus were tiny. He determined that mold made a substance that could dissolve bacteria. The fungus was penicilium chrysogenum and thus Fleming called this substance penicillin, by the name of the mold that produces it. Thus, after several years of experiments in 1930, Howard Florey and Ernest Chain developed at Oxford University the procedures to produce pure penicillin from the fungus that Fleming isolated. Thus penicillin could be concentrated by Florey and Chain, and in 1945 they shared with Fleming the Nobel Prize in Medicine.
Then, <u><em>the correct answer is the option c)He thought the mold had released a chemical that prevented the bacteria’s growth.</em></u>
Answer:
Noble gases are considered as Inert because they are unreactive.
Explanation:
Seven noble elments are known to us , they are: helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, radon, and oganesson. Noble gases have 8 electrons in their outermost shell and hence their valence shell is complete, they donot need further electrons to complete their octet so they are unreactive. Also they posses following properties.
Answer:
-1190.24 kJ
Explanation:
The enthalpy change in a chemical reaction that produces or consumes gases is given by the expression:
ΔH = ΔU + Δngas RT
where Δn gas is the change of moles of gas, R is the gas constant,and T is temperature.
Now from the given balanced chemical reaction, the change in number of mol gas is equal to:
Δn gas = mole gas products - mole gas reactants = 2 - 5/2 = -1/2 mol
Sionce we know ΔU and the temperature (298 K), we are in position to calculate the change in enthalpy.
ΔH = -1189 x 10³ J + (-0.5 mol ) 8.314 J/Kmol x 298 K
ΔH = -1.190 x 10⁶ J = -1.190 x 10⁶ J x 1 kJ/1000 J = -1.190 x 10³ J
