Answer:
The correct answer is 3.36 L
Explanation:
The molecular weight of CO₂ is 44 g/mol (2 O + 1 C= (2 x (16 g/mol )) + 12 g/mol). We have 44 g in 1 mol CO₂, and we want to know how many mol are in 6.6 g:
44 g -------------- 1 mol CO₂
6.6 g -------------- X= 6.6 g x 1 mol / 44 g = 0.15 mol
In normal conditions of temperature and pressure, 1 mol of ideal gas occupies 22.4 L of volume, thus:
1 mol CO₂ ------------ 22.4 L
0.15 mol -------------- X= 3.36 L
So, 6.6 g CO₂ are equivalent to 0.15 mol CO₂ and they occupy 3.36 L.
Empirical formula is the simplest formula showing the simplest ratio of atoms in a compound. Calculated as shown;
we start by calculating the number of moles of each atom;
moles of nickel = 9.11 g ÷ 58.7 g = 0.155 moles
moles of fluorine = 5.89 g ÷ 19 g = 0.31 moles
Then we get the ratio of the moles of nickel to that of flourine
That is 0.155 : 0.31 (dividing by the smallest)
0.155/0.155 : 0.31/0.155
we get 1:2 ( the simplest ratio)
Therefore the empirical formula is nif2
Answer:
Carbonates (CO3-2), phosphates (PO4-3) and sulfides (S-2) are insoluble.
The exceptions are the alkali metals and the ammonium ion.
Explanation:
According to Le Chatelier's principle, any disturbance caused in an equilibrium reaction will shift the equilibrium in a direction that will oppose the change.
As the given reaction is as follows.

(a) When increase the temperature of the reactants or system then equilibrium will shift in forward direction where there is less temperature. It is possible for an endothermic reaction.
Thus, formation of
will increase.
- (b) When we decrease the volume (at constant temperature) of given reaction mixture then it implies that there will be increase in pressure of the system. So, equilibrium will shift in a direction where there will be decrease in composition of gaseous phase. That is, in the backward direction reaction will shift.
Hence, formation of
will decrease with decrease in volume.
- When we increase the mount of
then equilibrium will shift in the direction of decrease in concentration that is, in the forward direction.
Thus, we can conclude that formation of
will increase then.