Answer: 14 :12 water molecules,
Explanation: 17: 6 molecules
Answer:
HF is the limiting reactant
Explanation:
The balanced equation for the reaction is given below:
SiO₂ + 4HF —> SiF₄ + 2H₂O
From the balanced equation above,
1 mole of SiO₂ reacted with 4 moles of HF.
Finally, we shall determine the limiting reactant. This can be obtained as illustrated below:
From the balanced equation above,
1 mole of SiO₂ reacted with 4 moles of HF.
Therefore, 7.5 moles of SiO₂ will react with = 7.5 × 4 = 30 moles of HF.
From the calculation made above, we can see clearly that it will take a higher amount (i.e 30 moles) of HF than what was given from the question (i.e 5 moles) to react completely with 7.5 moles of SiO₂.
Therefore, HF is the limiting reactant and SiO₂ is the excess reactant.
1.12 miles of MgCl2 will be produced from the 32.0 of Mg(OH)2
1. Heart
2. Circulatory system
3. The circulatory system delivers oxygen and nutrients to cells and take away water .
4. Your heart is a muscle and it’s job is to pump blood throughout your circulatory system.
Hope this helps :)
Have a great day!
Answer:
Explanation:
The standard system of measurement is what is popularly referred to as SI unit (or international system of units). For example, the SI unit for length is basically in meters (m), which is convertible to millimeter (mm), centimeter (cm) or even kilometer (km).
If there is no standard system of measurement,
1) Scientists will not be able to compare data as every scientist will use a unit that suits him/herself which might make data incomparable as some units might be difficult to convert to other units or there conversion methods might even be debatable.
2) There might be a general lack of understanding of the research work done by a scientist/scientists in the scientific community. This is because the standard system of measurement affords scientists to communicate properly with the same or convertible units and based on 1. above, if scientists use any unit that isn't agreed upon, different/unknown/debatable units might make understanding of research works incomprehensible.
