Answer:
g(x)=f(x+3)+5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: x = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The hole in the graph (a discontinuity) exist where the function doesn't exist. Because anything divided by zero is undefined, then the function would not exit at 0, thus having a hole/discontinuity.
Answer:
a) Dependent
b) H0: µd = 0
Ha: µd > 0
c) Stat --> Basic Statistics ----> Paired t. then select samples 1 , 2 to get the required output
d) Not enough data
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Using values found in MINITAB 19 </u>
a) The samples are dependent and this is because the title of the test is the same ( i.e. A group of students given the LSAT )
<u>b) Appropriate hypothesis</u>
H0: µd = 0
Ha: µd > 0
<u>c) The Minitab procedure to be used to test the hypothesis is </u>
click on Stat --> Basic Statistics ----> Paired t. then select samples 1 , 2 to get the required output
d) Not enough data to create a probability plot
Answer:
there isn't a math question
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Previous concepts
A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".
The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".
The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".
2) Solution to the problem
On this case we want to test is
and the system of hypothesi on this case are:
Null Hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis:
On this case is our decision is FAILS to reject the null hypothesis then we can conclude that we don't have enough evidence to support the claim at the significance level provided. So the correct conclusion would be:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.