Which of the following statements about the force on a charged particle due to a magnetic field are not valid?

1 answer:

5 0

The correct answer is "None of the above; all of these statements are valid." All the statements namely, it depends on the particle's charge, it depends on the strength of the external magnetic field, it depends on the particle's velocity, and it acts at right angles to the direction of the particle's motion are all valid. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.

You might be interested in

What type of convergent boundary is Japan located at?

Whitepunk [10]

Japan is located in a subduction zone

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which type of wires are ferromagnetic metals?<br> cooper<br> aluminum<br> string

worty [1.4K]

It would be aluminum

5 0

3 years ago

Astronaut Rob leaves Earth in a spaceship at a speed of 0.960c relative to an observer on Earth. Rob's destination is a star sys

xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

A) 15.0 years

Explanation:

Due to the distance to the star system is in light-year units, we can compute the time by using:

$t=\frac{d}{v}=\frac{14.4 l-y}{0.960}=15l-y$

then, Rob will take to complete the trip about 15 light-years.

hope this helps!!

3 0

3 years ago

Fluid clutches are used on equipment that is subjected to?

mamaluj [8]

Fluid clutches are used on equipment that is subjected to higher torque per unit volume. This type of clutch makes use of an incompressible fluid like oil in order to transfer the input of a movement from a pedal and cylinder to an actuating cylinder. Releasing the this clutch would stop the transfer of power but still allowing the engine to turn continuously.

4 0

3 years ago

A student is studying the fossils of a plant species that lived several million years ago. The fossils of this species are found

tresset_1 [31]

B. Australia and Antarctica were a single landmass in the past.

Explanation:

The most likely explanation for why the fossils of this plant are found on these two continents is that Australia and Antarctica were a single landmass in the past.

This evidence is vastly supported by the theory of plate tectonics originally, the theory of continental drift.

Plate tectonics proposes that all land masses were once joined together as a single supercontinent called Pangaea.
The region of Antartica and Australia were once joined as a single continental mass.
The plant must have developed together at that time.
When the continents moved apart, they still had the fossils.

learn more:

Continental drift brainly.com/question/5002949

#learnwithBrainly

6 0

4 years ago