Supreme Court, is the highest court in the judicial system, and it is the last court for resolving non-constitutional matters.
The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke by the following:
(B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.
<h3>The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke</h3><h3 />
- The supreme court on June 18, 1978, declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidate the use of racial qoutes.
- Allan Bakke, a white man of California, filed a complaint against The medical school at the University of California, Davis.
- He applied twice to the medical school and with good marks but didnt get admission.
- Bakke said he had been subjected to unjust "race discrimination."
- In the Court, six separate opinions were issued, agreed that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional, and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke.
Thus, option (B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions is correct.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit here:
brainly.com/question/1755400
Sounds like a horror city with nothing normal happening, everyone having a tough time with imagination being normal,
For a more useful answer it looks like a town full of uncivilized people that understand a more violent interaction with the world around them and a poor education system.
When may the graduate of a nursing program use the designation RN? When a nurse passes their exams and the board approves the nurse as an RN, they are able to purchase their license. Once the nurse is approved and the license is purchase, a nurse is fully registered to work and may use the term RN.
I hope this will help you