Realist and Liberal perspectives would agree that the international system is inherently anarchic
The notion that there is no supreme authority or sovereign in the world is known as anarchy in the study of international relations. There is no hierarchically superior, coercive authority that can settle conflicts, uphold the law, or regulate the system of international politics in an anarchic state. It is commonly acknowledged that anarchy serves as the foundation for international relations theory.
It is feasible for ordered ties between nations to be maintained in an anarchic international system, contrary to how anarchy is typically understood in the field of international relations. For the realist, liberal, neo- realist, and neo- liberal models of international relations, anarchy provides the underpinnings.
To learn more about Anarchy click here:
brainly.com/question/1133894
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: <span>Telling and giving understanding are two different things.
Mink is valuable, coon is not, even though both are fur.
Janie implies that telling would be taken by people simply as passing sentence and would most likely forget it in a short period of time.
Making people understand on the other hand would most likely change people's behavior to the better.</span>
An effective way to teach children the difference between acceptable and unacceptable behavior is redirection. Redirection focuses on the desired behavior by helping children forget about the undesired behavior. so the answer is A.
Answer:
Process Evaluation
Explanation:
A process Evaluation is to which a program is operating as intended by assessing ongoing program operations and determining whether the target population is being served. Such evaluation helps the program staff members to identify needed interventions and change program components to improve service.
