The change in electric potential energy is given by:
ΔU = ΔVq
ΔU = change in PE, ΔV = potential difference, q = charge
Given values:
ΔV = 50V - 20V = 30V, q = 0.14C
Plug in and solve for ΔU:
ΔU = 30(0.14)
ΔU = 4.2J
Answer:
The ball exerts a force of 400 N on the bat.
Explanation:
Given that,
A baseball player hits a ball with 400 N of force.
We need to find the force the ball exert on the bat.
We know that,
According to Newton's third law, when object 1 exerts a force on an object 2, then object 2 will exert a force on object 1 but in opposite direction.
So, the ball exerts a force of 400 N on the bat.
Answer:
Ep = 3924 [J]
Explanation:
To calculate this value we must use the definition of potential energy which tells us that it is the product of mass by the acceleration of gravity by height.

where:
Ep = potential energy [J] (units of Joules)
m = mass = 40 [kg]
g = gravity acceleration = 9.81 [m/s²]
h = elevation = 10 [m]
![E_{p} =40*9.81*10\\E_{p} = 3924 [J]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E_%7Bp%7D%20%3D40%2A9.81%2A10%5C%5CE_%7Bp%7D%20%3D%203924%20%5BJ%5D)
Since the bag was at rest, its initial momentum is zero. The velocity of the ball before collision is 500 ms-1.
<h3>Linear momentum</h3>
The term momentum in physics refers the product of mass and velocity. If we know mass of the object and its velocity, then we calculate the momentum.
Momentum before collision for the bullet = 0.01 kg × v
Momentum before collision for the bag = 0
Momentum after collision for the bag and bullet = (0.01 kg + 0.49 kg) 10 = 5 Kgms-1
The velocity of the bullet before collision = 0.01 kg × v + 0 = 5 Kgms-1
v = 5 Kgms-1/0.01 kg
v = 500 ms-1
Learn more about momentum: brainly.com/question/904448
Answer:
(E) a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible
Explanation:
The trade is one strong reflection for many weak reflections (and more dangerous near-Earth space travel).
None of the answer choices except the last one has anything to do with the effect of exploding a satellite. When you are arguing that exploding a satellite is ill conceived, you need to address specifically the effects of exploding the satellite.