Answer:
The correct answer is The opportunity cost of an additional 100 dolls increases as more dolls are produced.
Explanation:
The opportunity cost is understood as the cost incurred in making a decision and not another. It is that value or utility that is sacrificed for choosing an alternative A and neglecting an alternative B. Taking a path means that the benefit offered by the discarded path is waived.
In any decision taken there is an implicit waiver of the utility or benefits that could have been obtained if any other decision had been made.
For each situation there is always more than one way to address it, and each form offers a greater or lesser utility than the others, therefore, whenever one or the other decision is made, the opportunities and possibilities offered by the others will have been renounced, that may be better or worse (opportunity cost greater or lesser).
Answer:
1 annoying customers
2 dirty dishes
3 fast orders
Explanation:
1 try to make sure the dish is correct
2 make sure all dishes r clean before opening
3 pre make usual meal orders
Answer:
a leasehold
Explanation:
Leasehold relates to an accounting phrase for a rented resource. Usually the asset is estate such as a house or storage within a building. The lessee buyouts with the property owner in return for a sequence of planned payouts throughout the lease term, for the lawful right to utilize the estate.
Once a lease agreement is signed, to a degree permitted by the deal, the purchaser or tenant starts to construct the accommodation for its activities. In commercial real estate, leaseholds are much more popular whereby supermarkets as well as other facilities can be constructed on the ground but often occur in housing uses, such as homes and condos.
Based on accounting principles, a $1 per unit tax levied on consumers of a good is equivalent to "a $1 per unit tax levied on producers of the good."
This is based on the idea that the market reaches the exact equilibrium price irrespective of who is accountable for paying the money to the government.
In other words, when the government levies a tax on a good, producers are not exempted from the tax levy because that money will be recouped from the producers' sales or revenue.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that tax on goods is inevitable to consumers and producers.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/22680521
When we're trying to determine a genetic foundation for intelligence and criminality we're allowing for the possibility of genetic determinism being a true thing which we obviously know it's not. For that reason it might be problematic to conclude anything about a genetic diagnosis for either of those considering there are always multiple variables which are at play.
