Sure! Let's do this in order.
First, we can simplify the left side with the distributive property, getting us
8c-14
Next, we can simplify the right side with the distributive property, getting us
8c-8-6.
That gives us 8c-14<8c-8-6.
We can subtract 8c from both sides, getting us
-14<-8-6
Simplify the right side to get
-14<-14
This inequality has no solution. This is because the variable is gone, and the remaining equation isn't true.
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x + y = 3 x - y = 1 --------- 2x + 0y = 4 2x = 4 (2x)/2 = 4/2 x = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
hope i am right
The answer is C.
Since here taxable income is over $77,100 and below $160,850, her tax is $15,698.75 + [.28*($95,000 - $77,100)].
Tax = $15,698.75 + [.28*($17,900)]<span>.
= </span>$15,698.75 + [$5012]<span>.
=</span><span> $</span><span>20,710.75
Thank you for posting this question. Please feel free to ask me more.</span>
Answer:
The correct option is D.) Causation cannot be determined from an observational study.
Step-by-step explanation:
The conclusion is not correct because
D.) Causation cannot be determined from an observational study.
Causation determined from an observational study is speculative and cannot be confirmed without data from a real experiment.
