Answer: Temperament, biological basis
Explanation: Temperaments refers to a consistent differences in individual behaviors that has a biological basis.
They are independent of values and attitude.
Temperaments are formed from infant and they do not change as the infant grows. it just develops with time.
It helps individuals determine how they will react to situations and form individuals personality traits.
Assuming you meant self-identity, basically it is who you are, like what you wear is how you express yourself, it can also be your gender-identity like using pronouns she/her,he/him,they/them,and many other pronouns, it can also be your sexuality, like bisexual, lesbian, gay, heterosexual, and others.
Answer: Depression
Explanation: Depression is the term used to describe a sustained period of economic decline. This period is usually characterized by sharp and high fall in production leading to significant drop in gross domestic products(GDP), increased percentage of unemployment, financial crisis and severe economic hardship. Depression is defined as a period of extreme recession which could result from deflation, alteration in monetary policy and loss of consumer confidence.
Keynesians agree with the above statement, but monetarists do not.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Monetary policy is nothing but a policy followed by the central bank or any other banking agencies' authorities. As they can include control of money supply and interest rate that in turn helps the government to create growth in economic.
Keynesians also believe in the fact money supply has some relation with the growth f the country’s economy. They literally don’t mind about the rate of interest and the time provided to it. But Monetarists strongly believe in controlling the money in the economy.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed in 1854, and according to this act, slavery was permitted throughout Kansas and Nebraska, and these two states were supposed to be admitted into the Union. However, there were many riots, both from pro-slavery movement, and anti-slavery movement, so the act didn't come into effect.
I would definitely be against the Act because, like I said, it allowed slavery in those two states. Slavery is illegal - you cannot be the owner of any person because we are all people. And given that according to this Act, that is exactly what you could do in those states, I would have definitely opposed it then, and now.
