Here, Twice fast means, she takes half time in doing same amount of work.
Let, Anna takes = 2t & Jane takes = t
It would be: 1/t + 1/2t = 1/15
2t + t / 2t² = 1/15
15(3t) = 2t²
2t² = 45t
Divide both sides by t,
2t = 45
t = 45/2
t = 22.5
& 2t = 22.5(2) = 45
In short, Anna would take 45 minutes
Hope this helps!
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
The answer would be -4
Hope this helps
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
t(35/100)=42
35t=4200
t=120
So there is a total of 120 fruit trees.
A square has two parallel sides and four right angles.