Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. H0: μ ≤ 104 Ha: μ > 104
Assuming the data leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, we would conclude that there is no sufficient statistical evidence to prove that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month.
b. The type error in this situation would be rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Rejecting the fact that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month when it was actually true.
c. Type II error in this case would be failing to reject the null when it is false. Failing to reject the fact that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month when it is actually not true.
The consequences for these errors might be disastrous including sueing of the accuser party etc.
Answer:
40: 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 20, 40
150: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 25, 30, 50, 75, 150
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:25,000 in 2 years at annual compound interest, if the rates for the successive years be 4% and 5% per annum respectively is: (1) Rs. 30,000 (2) Rs. 26,800 fa) Rs.
A=P[1+
100
r
]
n
⇒ A=Rs.25,000×(
100
106
)
3
⇒ 25,000×
50
53
×
50
53
×
50
53
⇒ A=Rs.29,775.40
⇒ CI=A−P
⇒ Rs.29,775.40−Rs.25,000
∴ CompoundInterest=Rs.4775.40.
I think the answer is letter D.
:) have a good day
