Which is the goal of science to develop new technology to apply information to test hypothesis to expand knowledge
2 answers:
You might be interested in
<u>Answer:</u> The theoretical yield of iron(III) sulfate is 26.6 grams
<u>Explanation:</u>
To calculate the number of moles, we use the equation:
.....(1)
Given mass of iron(III) phosphate = 20.00 g
Molar mass of iron(III) phosphate = 150.82 g/mol
Putting values in equation 1, we get:
The given chemical equation follows:
As, sodium sulfate is present in excess. So, it is considered as an excess reagent.
Thus, iron(III) phosphate is considered as a limiting reagent because it limits the formation of product.
By Stoichiometry of the reaction:
2 moles of iron(III) phosphate produces 1 mole of iron(III) sulfate
So, 0.133 moles of iron(III) phosphate will produce = of iron(III) sulfate
Now, calculating the mass of iron(III) sulfate from equation 1, we get:
Molar mass of iron(III) sulfate = 399.9 g/mol
Moles of iron(III) sulfate = 0.0665 moles
Putting values in equation 1, we get:
Hence, the theoretical yield of iron(III) sulfate is 26.6 grams
Answer:
The different structures are shown in the attachment.
I and II - structural isomers
I and III - Structural isomers
I and IV - structural isomers
II and III - structural isomers
II and IV - structural isomers
III and IV - stereoisomers
Explanation:
The knowledge of Isomerism is tested here; there are two types of isomerism ; structural and stereoisomerism.
- Structural Isomers have similar molecular and different double bond positioning, these occurs mostly in ALKENE FAMILY.
- Stereo-isomers have the same molecular formular and similar patterns but differ in their spatial arrangement. trans and cis are typical examples of stereo-isomers.
From the question; Relationship between I and II is that they are structural isomers since they have the same molecular formula, but different bond atom arrangement and infact they are the same compound.
- Relationship between I and III is that they are structural isomers with similar molecular formular but differ in the double bond position.
- Relationship between I and IV is that they are structural isomers with similar molecular formula but different double bond arrangement.
- Relationship between II and III is that they are structural isomers with similar molecular formular but different double bond position
- Relationship between II and IV is that they are also structural isomers with the same molecular formular but different double bond position.
- Relationship between III and IV is that they are stereo-isomers with same molecular formula but different spatial arrangement, hence cis and trans.
