The longer you spend reading and thinking about this question,
the more defective it appears.
-- In each case, the amount of work done is determined by the strength
of
the force AND by the distance the skateboard rolls <em><u>while you're still
</u></em>
<em><u>applying the force</u>. </em>Without some more or different information, the total
distance the skateboard rolls may or may not tell how much work was done
to it.<em>
</em>
-- We know that the forces are equal, but we don't know anything about
how far each one rolled <em>while the force continued</em>. All we know is that
one force must have been removed.
-- If one skateboard moves a few feet and comes to a stop, then you
must have stopped pushing it at some time before it stopped, otherwise
it would have kept going.
-- How far did that one roll while you were still pushing it ?
-- Did you also stop pushing the other skateboard at some point, or
did you stick with that one?
-- Did each skateboard both roll the same distance while you continued pushing it ?
I don't think we know enough about the experimental set-up and methods
to decide which skateboard had more work done to it.
A region within a magnetic material in which magnetization is in a uniform direction this means the individual magnetic moments of the atoms are aligned with one another and they point the same direction. when cooled bwlow a temperature called the curie temperature the magnetization of a piece of ferromagnetic material.<span />
The statement is not correct. Therefore, the answer is letter B. False. The actual definition of a volume variance is that it is the difference of the quantity consumed and the amount budgeted to be sold, the difference will furthermore be multiplied to the standard unit per price.
