That which is used by a seller to deceive a buyer is: a. Bait and switch
Bait and switch is a tactic that is used by entrepreneurs to attract customers. They tell them to purchase a good at a low price.
However, when they come to buy, they are encouraged to buy a good that costs more.
So, in this way, the bait and switch tactics is used by sellers to deceive the buyers.
Learn more about the bait and switch tactics here:
brainly.com/question/981097
Answer:
BEP 378,000
Explanation:
60 - 24 = 36 contribution margin
every units contribution $36 dollars
36 / 60 = 0.6 CM ratio
each dollar of sale generate 60 cents of contribution
226,800 fixed cost / 0.6 CMR = 378,000 BEP in dollars
If a company has a unit contribution margin of $80 and a contribution margin ratio of 50%. Then its unit selling price is $160 therefore option (d) is the correct answer.
Contribution margin, or dollar contribution in keeping with the unit, is the selling fee in step with the unit minus the variable price in line with the unit. "Contribution" represents the portion of sales that isn't eaten up by variable prices and so contributes to the coverage of fixed fees. The contribution margin is computed because of the promoting charge per unit, minus the variable value according to the unit. Additionally known as greenback contribution per unit, the measure indicates how a specific product contributes to the general income of the business enterprise.
To calculate the unit selling price use the formula
Unit selling price = contribution margin / contribution margin ratio
Unit selling price = $80 / 50%
Unit selling price = $160
Therefore option d) $160 is the correct answer
The contribution margin ratio of a business is the same as its revenue much less all variable fees, divided by means of its sales. It represents the marginal gain of producing one more unit.
Learn more about the Contribution margin here brainly.com/question/24881206
#SPJ4
The answer to your question is False
Answer and Explanation:
There is no copyright infringement here. Savant homes had not taken a copyright protection for the design prior to this time. Also in the case it was found that the design is not in fact a unique design by Savant homes as it is used widely and was common before savant homes used it. And so it was a dummy model for everyone to copy from. Therefore the infringement was considered invalid as there was no ground for savant homes to claim it as am intellectual property
