Answer:
2.5 seconds.
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the value of t when the height is 28 feet:
-16t^2 + 56t + 4 = 28
-16t^2 + 56t - 24 = 0
-8(2t^2 - 7t + 3) = 0
-8(2t - 1)(t - 3) = 0
t = 0.5, 3 seconds.
So on the upward journey the rock is at 28 feet at 0.5 second after the throw and at 3 seconds it is at 28 feet again while it is falling back.
Therefore the period when it is at least 28 feet above the ground is 3.0 - 0.5 = 2.5 seconds.
Since no base is stated, assume base 10
remember
loga-logb=log(a/b)
also

translates to

and log(a^z)=zlog(a)
log25x-log5=2 means

translates to

simplies to

translates to

expands to
100=5x
divide both sides by 5
20=x
Answer:
y=3x-2
Step-by-step explanation:
Because the equation for slope intercept form is y=mx+b!
Answer:
store a
Step-by-step explanation:
at store a you can get 10 apples for 8$
These are two questions and two answers.
1) Problem 17.
(i) Determine whether T is continuous at 6061.
For that you have to compute the value of T at 6061 and the lateral limits of T when x approaches 6061.
a) T(x) = 0.10x if 0 < x ≤ 6061
T (6061) = 0.10(6061) = 606.1
b) limit of Tx when x → 6061.
By the left the limit is the same value of T(x) calculated above.
By the right the limit is calculated using the definition of the function for the next stage: T(x) = 606.10 + 0.18 (x - 6061)
⇒ Limit of T(x) when x → 6061 from the right = 606.10 + 0.18 (6061 - 6061) = 606.10
Since both limits and the value of the function are the same, T is continuous at 6061.
(ii) Determine whether T is continuous at 32,473.
Same procedure.
a) Value at 32,473
T(32,473) = 606.10 + 0.18 (32,473 - 6061) = 5,360.26
b) Limit of T(x) when x → 32,473 from the right
Limit = 5360.26 + 0.26(x - 32,473) = 5360.26
Again, since the two limits and the value of the function have the same value the function is continuos at the x = 32,473.
(iii) If T had discontinuities, a tax payer that earns an amount very close to the discontinuity can easily approach its incomes to take andvantage of the part that results in lower tax.
2) Problem 18.
a) Statement Sk
You just need to replace n for k:
Sk = 1 + 4 + 7 + ... (3k - 2) = k(3k - 1) / 2
b) Statement S (k+1)
Replace
S(k+1) = 1 + 4 + 7 + ... (3k - 2) + [ 3 (k + 1) - 2 ] = (k+1) [ 3(k+1) - 1] / 2
Simplification:
1 + 4 + 7 + ... + 3k - 2+ 3k + 3 - 2] = (k + 1) (3k + 3 - 1)/2
k(3k - 1)/ 2 + (3k + 1) = (k + 1)(3k+2) / 2
Do the operations on the left side and you will find it can be simplified to k ( 3k +1) (3 k + 2) / 2.
With that you find that the left side equals the right side which is a proof of the validity of the statement by induction.