Answer: Situation analysis
Explanation:
The situation analysis is the collection of all the methods which is specifically used by the manager in an organization for analyzing both external and the internal environment of the firm.
It is the process of evaluating the growth of the company and the potential of the customers in terms of business. The importance of the situation analysis is that it provide strength and various types of opportunities in the market.
Therefore, Situation analysis is the correct answer.
Answer:
The Net Operating income will be the same for both methods.
Explanation:
Net Operating income under absorption costing and variable costing methods usually differ because of existence of inventory.
Fixed overheads are deferred in Inventory when using absorption costing. Meaning that a higher income is obtained under absorption costing than variable costing when there is inventory and a lower income under absorption costing than variable costing.
When units produced are units sold, there is no inventory. Therefore, the Net Operating income will be the same for both methods.
<span>Intense competition!!!I hope this helped!!</span>
Answer:
A. $96
B. $228
C. $42
Explanation:
A. Calculation to determine the Amount of SUTA tax the company must pay to Nebraska on Porter's wages
SUTA tax =$3,000 x 3.2%
SUTA tax = $96
Therefore the Amount of SUTA tax the company must pay to Nebraska on Porter's wages is $96
B. Calculation to determine the Amount of sUTA tax the company must pay to Michiganion Porter's wages
SUTA tax =($9,000 - $3,000 )x3.8%
SUTA tax =$6,000 x 3.8%
SUTA tax = $228
Therefore the Amount of SUTA tax the company must pay to Nebraska on Porter's wages is $228
C. Calculation to determine the Amount of the net FUTA tax on Porters wages
Net FUTA tax=$7,000 limit) x 0.6%
Net FUTA tax = $42
Therefore the Amount of SUTA tax the company must pay to Nebraska on Porter's wages is $42
Answer: $450 profit
The investor exercised the right to buy the stock for 60 and can sell the stock in the market for 68 for an $8 per-share gain.
The gain of 8 minus the premium of 3.50 gives the investor a profit of 4.50
(4.50 Ă— 100 = $450).