1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11111nata11111 [884]
3 years ago
14

Roberta is a real estate licensee representing the buyer. The buyer asks to see homes in a specific neighborhood. Roberta refuse

s to show any homes in that neighborhood to the buyer and tells the buyer, Nobody from your country lives in that neighborhood. Has Roberta violated any fair housing laws?
Business
1 answer:
DerKrebs [107]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

The fair housing law act is a law prohibits discrimination in the process of renting  , buying or selling a house. This discrimination may be based on race , skin , color , sex , nationality ,or any other characteristic towards a protected group,

Declining the buyer the opportunity to inspects home in a particular neighborhood because nobody form his country lives in that area is an act that violates fair housing laws as the process seems to be biased towards a group of people from a particular country.

You might be interested in
A Liquidation of a partnership LO P5 Kendra, Cogley, and Mei share income and loss in a 3:2:1 ratio (in ratio form: Kendra, 3/6;
morpeh [17]

Answer:

a. Inventory is sold for $608,400.

gain on sale of inventory = $608,400 - $537,600 = $70,800

allocation of gain:

Kendra 1/2 x $70,800 = $35,400

Cogley 1/3 x $70,800 = $23,600

Mei 1/6 x $70,800 = $11,800

Dr Cash 608,400

    Cr Inventory 537,600

    Cr Gain on sale of inventory 70,800

Dr Gain on sale of inventory 70,800

    Cr Kendra, capital 35,400

    Cr Cogley, capital 23,600

    Cr Mei, capital 11,800

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

    Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Kendra, capital 112,100

Dr Cogley, capital 196,175

Dr Mei, capital 146,025

    Cr Cash 454,300

b. Inventory is sold for $469,200.

loss on sale of inventory = $469,200 - $537,600 = -$69,400

allocation of loss:

Kendra 1/2 x $68,400 = $34,200

Cogley 1/3 x $68,400 = $22,800

Mei 1/6 x $68,400 = $11,400

Dr Cash 469,200

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 68,400

    Cr Inventory 537,600

 

Dr Kendra, capital 34,300

Dr Cogley, capital 22,800

Dr Mei, capital 11,400

    Dr Loss on sale of inventory 68,400

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

    Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Kendra, capital 42,400

Dr Cogley, capital 149,775

Dr Mei, capital 122,825

    Dr Cash 315,100

c) c. Inventory is sold for $358,800 and any partners with capital deficits pay in the amount of their deficits.

loss on sale of inventory = $358,800 - $537,600 = -$178,800

allocation of loss:

Kendra 1/2 x $178,800 = $89,400

Cogley 1/3 x $178,800 = $59,600

Mei 1/6 x $178,800 = $29,800

Dr Cash 358,800

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 178,800

    Cr Inventory 537,600

 

Dr Kendra, capital 89,400

Dr Cogley, capital 59,600

Dr Mei, capital 29,800

    Dr Loss on sale of inventory 178,800

Dr Cash 12,700

    Cr Kendra, capital 12,700

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

    Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Cogley, capital 112,975

Dr Mei, capital 104,425

    Dr Cash 217,400

   

d. Inventory is sold for $298,800 and the partners have no assets other than those invested in the partnership.

loss on sale of inventory = $298,800 - $537,600 = -$238,800

allocation of loss:

Kendra 1/2 x $238,800 = $119,400

Cogley 1/3 x $238,800 = $79,600

Mei 1/6 x $238,800 = $39,800

Dr Cash 298,800

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 238,800

    Cr Inventory 537,600

 

Dr Kendra, capital 119,400

Dr Cogley, capital 79,600

Dr Mei, capital 39,800

    Dr Loss on sale of inventory 238,800

Dr Cogley, capital 28,467

Dr Mei, capital 14,233

    Cr Kendra, capital 42,700

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

    Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Cogley, capital 64,508

Dr Mei, capital 80,192

    Dr Cash 144,700

6 0
3 years ago
A service provided by e-government that requires access to the Internet is _____.
Elan Coil [88]
RFID tags in my idea...
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jones Company possesses a 25 percent interest in the outstanding voting shares of Sandridge Company. Under what circumstances mi
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

Jones may decide that the equity method would not be appropriate to account for the investment when Jones Company does not have significant influences over the management/operation of Sandridge Company.

Although an investors holding from 25% of investee is very much likely to have significant influences on the investee, this may not be true all over the times. For Jones, to prove that it does not have significant influences over Sandridge, there may be some following evidences:

+ Jones and Sandridge sign an agreement that Jones surrenders  significant rights as a shareholder;

+ There is/are investor(s)/group(s) of investors who has more voting right than Jones and whose visionary/mission for Sandridge is opposite to Jones's.

+ Sandridge tries to reject Jones' influences on its management by seeking lawsuit or by successfully prevent representatives from Jones on its Board of Directors.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
A university officer wants to know the proportion of registered students that spend more than 20 minutes to get to school. He se
vlada-n [284]

Answer:

1) We need a random sample. For this case we assume that the sample selected was obtained using the simple random sampling method.

2) We need to satisfy the following inequalities:

n\hat p =25*0.52= 13 \geq 10

n(1-\hat p) = 25*(1-0.52) =12 \geq 10

So then we satisfy this condition

3) 10% condition. For this case we assume that the random sample selected n represent less than 10% of the population size N . And for this case we can assume this condition.

So then since all the conditions are satisfied we can conclude that we can apply the normal approximation given by:

p \sim N (\hat p, \sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}})

So then the answer for this case would be:

a. Yes.

Explanation:

For this case we assume that the question is: If in the experiment described we can use the normal approximation for the proportion of interest.

For this case we have a sample of n =25

And we are interested in the proportion of registered students that spend more than 20 minutes to get to school.

X = 13 represent the number of students in the sample selected that have a time more than 20 min.

And then the estimated proportion of interest would be:

\hat p = \frac{X}{n}= \frac{13}{25}= 0.52

And we want to check if we can use the normal approximation given by:

p \sim N (\hat p, \sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}})

So in order to do this approximation we need to satisfy some conditions listed below:

1) We need a random sample. For this case we assume that the sample selected was obtained using the simple random sampling method.

2) We need to satisfy the following inequalities:

n\hat p =25*0.52= 13 \geq 10

n(1-\hat p) = 25*(1-0.52) =12 \geq 10

So then we satisfy this condition:

3) 10% condition. For this case we assume that the random sample selected n represent less than 10% of the population size N . And for this case we can assume this condition.

So then since all the conditions are satisfied we can conclude that we can apply the normal approximation given by:

p \sim N (\hat p, \sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}})

So then the answer for this case would be:

a. Yes.

3 0
3 years ago
Maritime Sail Makers manufactures sails for sailboats. The company has the capacity to produce 37 comma 000 sails per year and i
kirza4 [7]

Answer:

Increase in income= $550,000

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Variable costs per​ unit:

Manufacturing $60

If a special pricing order is accepted for 5,500 sails at a sales price of $ 160 per​ unit

Because there is no change in the fixed costs and there are no variable selling and administrative costs, the effect on income will be equal to the change in total contribution margin.

Total contribution margin= number of units* (selling price - unitary variable cost

Total contribution margin change= 5,500* (160 - 60)= $550,000

Increase in income= $550,000

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • On January 1, Collins Corporation had 800,000 shares of $10 par value common stock outstanding. On March 31, the company declare
    9·1 answer
  • Evening Star, Inc. produces binoculars of two quality levels: field and professional. The field model requires six direct-labor
    10·1 answer
  • If a purely competitive firm is currently facing a situation where the price of its product is lower than the average variable c
    8·2 answers
  • On January 1, 2018, the Accounts Receivable and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts balances of Kendall Company were $40,000 and
    15·1 answer
  • A buyer anticipates a house payment of $1,000 per month, with monthly homeowner association fees of $150. The buyer also has a c
    8·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    7·1 answer
  • Select the answer that best describes what happens when shareholders receive a series of distributions, not part of an installme
    14·1 answer
  • Price elasticity for a good depends on the share of a consumer's budget spent on a good. Other things being equal, which of the
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following should NOT be used as a piece of personal protective equipment when using pesticides?
    15·1 answer
  • Nair Corp. enters into a contract with a customer to build an apartment building for $1,000,000. The customer hopes to rent apar
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!