Explanation:
here is the answer didnt wanna type it all out.
Im pretty sure they didn't think it was right
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Imagine you were responsible for releasing an animal after it was raised in captivity. The animal survives well in cold temperatures and eats fish. Describe the type of environment where you would release this animal, and explain your reasoning.
I would release this animal in a tundra kind of weather, like in Russia, for instance- If the animal can resist cold temperatures and eats fish, this could be a bear or a seal. Both animals can very well live in this new environment for them.
THe Artic, in the North Pole, is a classic example of tundra weather, a place where temperatures can be extremely cold.
Since they viewed it as a great way to 'decrease the surplus population', having a different, more sympathetic outlook would have helped. Giving them food they could cook and eat would also have helped: the Irish had a lot of trouble trying to prepare and eat the Indian meal they sent. They could also have opened more soup kitchens, told the landlords to show a little leniency and stop evicting people because heir livelihoods were gone and their means of paying rent with them. But they wanted to get rid of the Irish, and so they did. There was a famine in the Scottish Highlands in 1846 and because of charitable efforts nowhere near as many people died. They could have saved them by showing charity, but they didn't.