Answer:
unrealised profit on unsold stock with james corporation = $30000
so correct option is b. $30,000
Explanation:
owns = 80 %
sold = $250,000
inventory = 40 %
Gross profit = 20 %
Gross profit = 30 %
amount of intra entity gross profit
solution
unsold stock with james corporation are = 40 % of $250000
unsold stock with james corporation = $100,000
and
unrealised profit on unsold stock with james corporation is in consolidated statement is = unsold stock with james corporation × profit rate i.e 30%
unrealised profit on unsold stock with james corporation = $100000 × 30%
unrealised profit on unsold stock with james corporation = $30000
so correct option is b. $30,000
Veterinary care. Due to others being things or objects.
The development of Zumba is considered a <u>service-level</u> activity Garfield.
Service Level activities are those activities that are necessary to provide a service to the customer. In this case, the service is offering Zumba classes in the group training room. This activity involves learning the Zumba steps, finding music, and scheduling classes.
All of these activities are necessary to provide the service and therefore, are considered service-level activities for Garfield Personal Training Services.
Therefore the correct answer is C) Service Level.
For more questions like Zumba classes click the link below:
brainly.com/question/14251451
#SPJ4
Answer: d) Extreme programming
Explanation:
Extreme programming is one of the most significant programming improvement system of Agile models. It is utilized to improve programming quality and receptive to client's requirements. The extreme programming model suggests taking the prescribed procedures that have functioned admirably in the past in program improvement ventures to extreme levels. It also
tries to decrease cost of changes in requirements by having multiple short development cycles. Project are divided into smaller functions and developer cannot go to the next stage until it completes the current stage.
Answer:
D) All of the above have been proposed
Explanation:
The problem with the too big to fail financial policy is that financial institutions that are considered too big started to assume greater investment risks since they were treated differently than other not too big banks.
For example, if the FDIC decides that a too big to fail bank is about to fail, they will use the purchase and assumption method to ensure that the bank's depositors don't suffer losses, but the government assumes the losses and the government is paid by all of us.
The Dodd-Frank Act makes it harder for the Federal Reserve to bail out financial institutions, but that is simply not enough. Big banks have played enough with the taxpayers' money and should be held responsible for their actions. They at like spoiled children that go around breaking things because their parents will pay for them.
