<span>I this case, the loan is still valid and at that point Mike would be responsible for finding a way to pay the loan back as agreed upon in the contract. This is called co-signing, when two parties both sign for a loan together. Both parties are responsible for the loan and even though David cannot be found, the loan must still be paid and Mike would be held responsible for this.</span>
Answer and Explanation:
The Journal entries are shown below:-
Interest expense Dr, $316,800
Premium on bonds payable Dr, $19,200 ($96,000 ÷ 5)
To Interest payable $336,000 ($4,800,000 × 7%)
(Being interest expense and bond premium amortization is recorded)
Here we debited the interest expenses and premium on bonds as it increased the expenses and we credited the interest payable as it also increased the liabilities
Answer:
E. Ursula is likely to prevail because an enforceable unilateral contract exists based on her provision of information leading to the capture of Victor.
Explanation:
A unilateral contract is in existence because safe bank has made an offer to pay $10,000. And in a unilateral contract when an offerer like safe bank makes an offer, the offer is accepted through actual performance which Ted has done through information Ursula provided. Therefore Ursula would prevail because unilateral contracts are enforceable by the law.
I believe its owners , but hopefully i helped
