Answer:
The answer would be b, determining tax deductions
Explanation:
All three of the other points are ways you can find out customers needs and wants, however tax deduction is used to figure out how much tax is owed.
Answer:
His return on investment is negative 8.7%
Explanation:
Thomas purchased 2,500 shares of EKK at $54 per share (=$135,000 / 2,500).
He received $750 (= $0.30 x 2,500) in annual dividends.
He sold his 2,500 shares at $49 per share = $122,500
The total amount of money he received from his investment is $122,500 + $7
50 = $123,250, then we divide that by $135,000 = 0.913 - 1 = -8.7%
Answer:
$26,000
Explanation:
The Sales volume variance can be calculated using the following formula:
Sales Volume Variance = Actual Sales ($) - Budgeted Sales ($)
Or you can also use the following formula:
Sales Volume Variance = (Actual Sales Units - Budgeted Sales Units) * Budgeted price per unit
Here
Actual Sales ($) is 77000 unit at $14 budgeted sales price per unit which means total sales in dollars was $1,078,000.
Budgeted Sales ($) is 79000 unit at $14 budgeted sales price per unit which means total budgeted sales in dollars was $1,104,000.
Sales Volume Variance = $1,078,000 - $1,104,000 = $26,000
Answer:
0.09 or 9%
Explanation:
This question has some irregularities. The correct question should be :
Elinore is asked to invest $4,900 in a friend's business with the promise that the friend will repay $5,390 in one year's time. Elinore finds her best alternative to this investment, with similar risk, is one that will pay her $ 5,341 in one year's time. U.S. securities of similar term offer a rate of return of 7%. What is the opportunity cost of capital in this case?
Solution
Given from the question
Investment (I) = $4,900
Return on investment (ROI) in one year = $5,341
Rate or opportunity cost of capital r is given by
ROI = I × (1 + r)
input the given data
$5,341 = $4,900 (1 + r)
$5,341 = $4,900 + $4,900r
$5,341 - $4,900 = $4,900r
r = ($5,341 - $4,900) / $4,900
r = 0.09
Or 9% in percentage
Answer: Carry out the Plan of Planning not to Plan.
As Fashion brand Zara is very popular clothing and accessories retailer. Its success as top 50 fashion brands is attributed to its unique approach of planning to achieve its vision of innovation and quality.
For ever changing style and trend, fashion industry is unpredictable, specially for brands and fashion lines. The changing trends in short span of time can cost high for business perspective as there can be huge restocking of seasonal production, if brands fail to identify future fashion trends in advance. To combat huge loss from such over stocking of production, Zara brand have implemented operational strategy to plan less. This is the Planning to plan less".
Most of the luxury fashion brands operate their production line based on prediction of what trend will be popular in coming months. This is risky plan, since fashion industry is very unpredictable.
Zara however devised unique plan to not plan. This way the brand does\t entirely plan the production line for next six months in advance, but only 50-60%. Rest of it, it changes according to the season. This way, Zara only have limited edition of certain designs and even less stock of those items. This way, the customer have to buy the items immediately after its launch because same item might not be there next time. This not only reduce stocking of production but also increases business as buyers constantly visit stores to but items which they know won't linger there for longer time.
