Answer:
Yes, there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No ;
Step-by-step explanation:
n = 1000
x = 545
Phat = x / n = 545/1000 = 0.545
H0: p ≤ 0.5
H1: μ > 0.5
The test statistic :
(phat - p0) ÷ √(p(1 - P0) / n)
Test statistic :
(0.545 - 0.5) ÷ √(0.5(0.5) / 1000)
0.045 / 0.0158113
Test statistic = 2.846
α = 0.01
Decison :
Reject H0 ; if Pvalue < α
Using the Pvalue from Test statistic (Z) calculator :
Pvalue = 0.002214
With Pvalue < α ; We reject H0 and conclude that there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No, making generalization about all women would not be reasonable as the data employed for the research mainly focuses on a particular
Answer: a and c
Step-by-step explanation:
I know it’s not b but isn’t adjacent angel two angels?
Correct me if I’m wrong
Answer:
Explanation:
[ Step One ] Remove Parenthesis: (a) = a
[ Step Two ] Multiply: 
[ Step Three ] Apply Exponent Rule 
[ Step Four ] Apply Exponent Rule: 
[ 
]
➤
Answer:
X - 7 = - 3
X = - 3 + 7
X = 4
the 7 turns positive because it was moved to the other side of the symbol "=" so we reverse the sign
- becomes +
and
+ becomes -
Blue point➡️ Lowell➡️ Lexington
