I think would be most susceptible to have mumps is the Patty. <span>
</span><span>If we review the conditions: Tina had mumps vaccine; her mother had mumps before; baby sister was breastfed, which is not a protection for mumps, and Patty wasn't vaccinated but was the one who had contact with the person who has mumps. Patty was the most vulnerable.</span>
<span>The main reasons for mumps are through situations where saliva was able to be passed. </span><span> Such situations were sneezing, coughing, food sharing, plate use, kissing, and touching the nose or mouth of people with mumps.</span>
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Suppose a firm's CFO thinks that an externality is present in a project, but that it cannot be quantified with any precision ¾ estimates of its effect would really just be guesses. In this case, the externality should be ignored ¾ i.e., not considered at all ¾ because if it were considered it would make the analysis appear more precise than it really is. This is a false statement.
house remodeling- this job takes an artistic person to be able to envision how to make a home look better and what all it would take to insert their vision in the home they are remodeling
Answer:
The given condition is an example of:
A. Menu costs
Explanation:
In the given question mentioning data is that
Jake is been managing a grocery store in any country which is experiencing high rate of inflation. He is mentioned to be paid in cash.
On his very payday he went outside immediately and bought as many goods as he could for himself as he was going to get his pay today and was needing those items.
So, he thought of buying all the items he is needing as for the next two weeks in order of prevention of the money in his wallet from losing value due to high inflation rates.
And at last what he couldn't spend on buying for all that amount he converted that amount into most stable foreign currency for being used as a steep fee.
So all this were an example of :
A. Menu costs
Answer:
C) the nominal value of aggregate income is determined
Explanation:
The quantity theory of money states that nominal aggregate income is determined by money supply. It is assumed that money velocity is constant in the short run and so would not impact nominal aggregate income.
The quantity theory of money is obtained from the equation of exchange which is:
(Money supply × velocity ) = (price × agregrate output)
Dividing both sides by velocity gives,
Money supply = (1/velocity) × ( price × agregrate output)
It is assumed velocity is constant, therefore,
Money supply = k × (price × agregrate output)
I hope my answer helps.
All the best
