All categories

3 years ago

ILL GIVE BRAINLISTS!!!!!!

Chemistry

2 answers:

8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago

4 0

I think A would be the correct answer to this question.

olga nikolaevna [1]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Geologists have different specialties that can sometimes cause them to look at data differently.

Explanation:

The geologists shown in the question above are scientists, and, like all good scientists, are analyzing data to answer a natural phenomenon, which in this case is the occurrence of earthquakes in a given area.

However, science is often not accurate, as it is liable to several different thoughts and conclusions. In the case of the question above, this can be seen at the moment when, through the analysis of the same data, two groups of scientists had different conclusions about the occurrence of earthquakes. This is because each group of scientists has their own specialty and each specialty has a different way of evaluating data.

You might be interested in

A water molecule collides with a sugar molecule. What type of energy

zlopas [31]

Answer:

kinetic energy.

Explanation:

an object in motion collides with another object to make that object in motion.

kinetic energy is the energy of an object being in motion.

7 0

4 years ago

If the unknown elements on the periodic table are "unknown" how did they end up in the periodic table in the first place? *think

mezya [45]

Answer:

The periodic table is a marvel of organization, with each column and each row showing all ... Scientists identified the rest of them in the first half of the 20th century. ... They created in their lab a synthetic, previously unknown element. ... The Berkeley scientists did this for weeks on end, and produced a tiny amount of curium.

Explanation:

8 0

4 years ago

Which of the following are binary ionic compounds?

umka2103 [35]

Answer:

the correct answer would be D Iron (III) oxide

Explanation:

hope this helps

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following statements about the brain is true? a. The skull could support as much as 3 tons of weight. b. The brain

Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

a. The skull could support as much as 3 tons of weight.

Explanation:

The true statement about brain is

a. The skull could support as much as 3 tons of weight.

The cranium(skull) bones are slot like a jigsaw puzzle together. All but one of these bones is fixed in place in adults. It makes the skull very solid. Babies have holes between the cranial (skull) bones so that as they are born, their heads may withstand being crushed.

rest all statements are wrong.

8 0

3 years ago

In addition to not causing damage to the sample, what is another advantage of using a microspectrophotometer to analyze fibers?

Tems11 [23]

Another advantage of advantage of using a microspectrophotometer to analyze fibers asides not causing damage to the sample is that the sample can be quite small.

<h3>What is a microspectrophotometer?</h3>

Microspectrophotometry is a biological technique used to measure the absorption or transmission spectrum of a solid or liquid material in either transmitted or reflected light.

Microspectrophotometry can also measure the emission of light by a sample, which is usually small as the micro implies.

One advantage of microspectrophotometry is that the sample does not get damaged. However,

However, another advantage of advantage of using a microspectrophotometer to analyze fibers asides not causing damage to the sample is that the sample can be quite small.

Learn more about microspectrophotometry at: brainly.com/question/5832827

5 0

2 years ago