Answer:
i = 5.48%
Explanation:
We can use the following method to solve the given problem in the question.
Two consecutive 3 year CDs:
=10000 * (1+(0.05/4))^12 * (1+.(0.05/4))^12 = 13, 473.51
One 5 year CD and a 1 year CD:
=10000 * (1+(0.0565/4))^20 * (1+.(0.04/4))^4 = 13,775.75
13,775.75 is the greater.
The annual effective rate is
=10000 * (1+I)^6 = 13,775.75
i = 5.48%
Answer:
2. $81
Explanation:
According to the situation the computation of weighted-average unit contribution margin is here below:-
Q Drive Q Drive Plus
Selling price $135 $180
Variable cost $75 $90
Contribution margin
per unit $60 $90
Sales mix 30% 70%
$18 $63
The weighted-average unit contribution margin = Q Drive + Q Drive Plus
= $18 + $63
= $81
The provision is not enforceable if it is a reasonable estimate of the loss on the breach.
Option - b
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
There are a few solutions for rupture of agreement, for example, grant of harms, explicit execution, rescission, and restitution. In courts of restricted purview, the fundamental cure is an honor of harms.
Since explicit execution and rescission are evenhanded cures that don't fall inside the purview of the officer courts, they are not canvassed in this instructional exercise.
The count of compensatory harms relies upon the kind of agreement that was broken and the sort of misfortune that was caused. Some broad rules are:
Standard measure, The standard proportion of harms is a sum that would permit the no breaching gathering to purchase a substitute for the advantage that would have been gotten if the agreement had been performed.
In situations where the expense of the substitute is theoretical, the no breaching gathering may recoup harms in the measure of the expense caused in playing out that gathering's commitments under the agreement.
Answer:
Choice A would be the right response to either the following statement.
Explanation:
- This theory seems to be a hypothesis that implies that shareholders will seek a higher rate of return as well as premiums on high-term securities with significantly increased risk maturity since, if all other considerations are similar, investors choose cash and perhaps other extremely liquid assets.
- Even if there is an excess of capital, the inflation rate would have been over stability, as well as the amount of money needed would have been too increasing for stability.
The other choices are not relevant to the situation in question. So choice A is the right one.
Yes, to be completely honest. Personal finances could be affected at any moment, but the way that our country progresses with little to nothing of a code or backup plan for those who are in need, I do feel as if I could lose my finances within a blink of an eye.
