Answer:
There was an improvement in accuracy. There was no change in precision.
Explanation:
<em>The average mass after recalibration is closer to the mass of the standard, </em>so the recalibration improved the accuracy<em> </em>(the measurement is closer to an accepted 'true' value).
The standard deviation did not change, so the precision (or how disperse the measurements are) was not affected.
<span>All of the mechanisms work together to cool the pot of boiling water. </span>Hope this helps!
I would say mass lost by nuclear collisions. The mass defect is the mass difference between the mass of an atomic nucleus and the sum of the mass of its constituent particles. It equals the energy given off in the formation of the nucleus.
The main <span>hazard </span>is the Radiation and the Gamma rays that are dispersed
Molar mass:
H₂O = 18.0 g/mol
O₂ = 32.0 g/mol
C₅H₁₂ + 8 O₂ -> 5 CO₂ + 6 H₂<span>O
</span>
8 x (32 g )<span> ------------ 6 x (18 g )</span>
mass O₂ ------------ 108 g H₂O
mass O₂ = 108 x 8 x 32 / 6 x 18
mass O₂ = 27648 / 108
mass O₂ =<span> 256 g</span>
<span>hope this helps!</span>