Answer: P =$50
Q= 25
Explanation: P= 100-2Q
P= 2Q
To get the quantity supplied Q, we have to educate both equations
100-2Q=2Q, 100=2Q+2Q
100=4Q, Q=100/4 , Q=25
To get the equilibrium price we have to substitute the value of Q which is 25 into any of the equation.
Using equation 1
P=100-2Q, P=100-2(25)
P=100-50, P=$50.
If the price is controlled at $60, then the production pays the producer this is because a commodity is not expected to be sold at the equilibrium price, price flooring is a way that government or a group control the market price of a commodity or produce by imposing a particular price on it. This is to ensure that the producers are not at loss with their production, a price floor is always higher than the equilibrium price to be effective as seen in the example given above, price floor is $60 while equilibrium price is $50.
An example of a price floor for services can be seen in the minimum wage stated by the government this is to ensure that people's services are not misused anyhow.
Price flooring most times can lead to surplus quantity produced if consumers are not willing to pay the price, because the producer will be wiling to produce more in order to make more profit.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, The Canadian Airline would have used Lost Customer Recovery Strategy.
Explanation:
When the sales of the Canadian Airline declines, they surveyed their target market which is Business Class Travelers. From the responses of the customers, they found out that customers feel bounded by the staff of the airplane. They think that they were totally controlled by the staff on board.
Now if the Canadian Airline would have surveyed their former customers, then they would have known why they left their airline, and what was their concerns and what they want in this airline; then the strategy used by them would have Lost Customer Recovery Strategy.
Answer:
Asset U
Explanation:
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset Q = Expected return / standard deviation
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset Q = 6.5% / 5.5%
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset Q = 1.1818
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset U = Expected return / standard deviation
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset U = 8.8% / 5.5%
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset U = 1.6
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset B = Expected return / standard deviation
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset B = 8.8% / 6.5%
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset B = 1.3538
The investor should prefer Asset U because its has the highest reward to volatility ratio among the three options.
Answer:
Decrease
Explanation:
Calculation to determine overall break-even point for the entire company
Contribution margin for C90B = ($19,950-
$5,985)/$19,950
Contribution margin for C90B = 70%
Contribution margin for Y45E =( $26,190- $10,476)/$26,190
Contribution margin for Y45E= 60%
Therefore Based on the above calculation if the sales mix were to shift toward Product C90B with total dollar sales remaining constant, the overall break-even point for the entire company
Would DECREASE reason been that C90B have more contribution margin ratio of 70% compare to Y45E which had contribution margin ratio of 60%
Answer:
answer is normal
Explanation:
please mark me as brainlier
