If a substance has a relatively low melting point (below 400ºF), then it is either molecular polar or molecular non-polar
If a substance has a high melting point, then it is either metallic, covalent network, or ionic
The stronger a substance’s bonds, the higher its melting point
Answer:
2Fe + 3H2SO4 + Fe2(SO4)3+ 3H2
Explanation:
1. Fe (SO4) 3 is an incorrectly written formula because iron is trivalent as we can see by this three ahead of SO4. SO4 is divalent always.
2. since (SO4) is 3, this three shows us that there must be 3 in the reactants as well.
so now there is 3H2SO4
3. Since we have added 3 to one hydrogen we must add another. So now it's 3H2
4. and finally iron. In Fe2 (SO4) 3 we see this 2 in front of Fe which means it goes 2Fe.
When studying atoms, scientists can ignore <u>the Gravitational</u> force between charged particles that make up the atoms because it is many millions of times smaller than other forces in the atom.
Explanation:
Scientists can ignore the gravitational force because the gravitational force is considered to be negligible as compared to the other forces due to its smaller value.We all know that the gravitational force is directly proportional to the mass of an object which result in a small force value.When the value of this small force is compared to the value of the electrical force between protons and electrons in atoms the we can say that the electrical force is million times stronger than the gravitational force
Thus we can say that scientists can ignore <u>the Gravitational</u> force between charged particles that make up the atoms because it is many millions of times smaller than other forces in the atom.
<span>Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. Several months later, they received the paper back from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. It is either that they revise their study or replicate the study. Most scientists would revisit their work and the findings they had from their research. Most probable if they were successful and the comments of the publisher and the co-scientists were positive they could replicate the study to validate its accountability.<span>
</span></span>
