Answer:
I guess you can round it to 11 seconds.
Explanation:
Going with a speed 9m/s means you are going 9 meters in each second.
If you are going 9 meters in second how many seconds will it take to 100 meters?
Visually;
9 meters - - - 1 second
100 meters - - - ?seconds.
When you write like this 9 times ?seconds equal to 100 meters time 1 second. (you probably know this but just in case)
So to find ?second you multiply 100meters by 1 and divide it by 9 whixh will give you 11.1111 seconds whixh again I believe you can round it to 11.
(Kind of a) Proof;
If 9m * ?sec = 100 m * 1 sec
you send 9 meters to other side.
?sec = (100 m * 1 sec) ÷ 9m
Hope it was clear and it helps! Please let me know if you have any questions.
Answer:
C)the right cord pulls on the pulley with greater force than the left cord
Explanation:
As we can see the figure that B is connected to the right string while A is connected to the left string
Now force equation for B as it will move downwards is given as
similarly for block A which will move upwards we can write the equation as
now we know that pulley is also rotating so the tangential acceleration of the rope at the contact point with pulley must be same as that of acceleration of the blocks
so here pulley will rotate clockwise direction
So tension in the right string must be more than the left string
So correct answer will be
C)the right cord pulls on the pulley with greater force than the left cord
A = (v - u) / t
a = acceleration
v = final velocity
u = initial velocity
t = time
45 = (v - 300) / 10
45 × 10 = v - 300
450 + 300 = v
v = 750 m/s
Hope this helps!
P.S. Let me know if you need an explanation
<span>The answer is The conductance of a conductor is inversely
proportional to the cross-sectional area of the conductor.</span>
<span>Conductance is directly related to the ease offered by any material to the passage of electric current. Conductance is the opposite of resistance. The higher the conductance, the lower the resistance and vice versa, the greater the resistance, the less conductance, so both are inversely proportional</span>
Answer: A
Explanation:
honestly, it sounded the best
