Answer:
Use a faster than normal approach and landing speed.
Explanation
For pilots, it is one of the critical moments of the flight that concentrates 12% of fatal accidents. The main difficulty lies in reaching enough speed to take flight within the space of the runway. At present, it ceased to be a challenge for the aircraft, since the engine power improved, so the takeoff ceased to be the most dangerous moment of the flight.
One of the risks that aircraft face today is that some of the engines fail while the plane accelerates. In that case, the pilot must decide in an instant whether it is better to take flight and solve the problem in the air or if it is preferable not to take off.
Although for many staying on the ground might seem the most sensible option, it is not as simple as it seems: to suddenly decelerate an aircraft, with the weight it has and the speed it reaches can cause accidents. However, today a special cement was designed that runs around the runways of the airports, which when coming into contact with the wheels of the aircraft the ground breaks and helps to slow down.
In several of the questions you've posted during the past day, we've already said that a wave with larger amplitude carries more energy. That idea is easy to apply to this question.
Answer: 25.38 m/s
Explanation:
We have a straight line where the car travels a total distance
, which is divided into two segments
:
(1)
Where 
On the other hand, we know speed is defined as:
(2)
Where
is the time, which can be isolated from (2):
(3)
Now, for the first segment
the car has a speed
, using equation (3):
(4)
(5)
(6) This is the time it takes to travel the first segment
For the second segment
the car has a speed
, hence:
(7)
(8)
(9) This is the time it takes to travel the secons segment
Having these values we can calculate the car's average speed
:
(10)
(11)
Finally:
This is another one of those muddy misleading questions, followed by
a muddy group of choices from which an answer must be selected.
a). is absurd. There's no such thing as a "balanced force", only
a balanced group of forces.
b). is probably the choice the question is aiming for.
c). is not so. The engines of an airplane do plenty of work lifting the plane
off the ground, although the force of the engines is never directed upward.
d). is really awkward. The object's motion is almost never the cause of the force.
The force is almost always the cause of the object's motion.
Now for the big 800-lb gorilla in the room: No moving object needs to be involved
in order for energy to be flowing or work to be getting done.
-- A radio wave radiates through space. Straighten out a wire coat-hanger and
stick it up in the air where the radio wave can pass by it. Electrical current flows
through the wire, and you can drain the electrical energy out the bottom of it.
-- A light bulb is shining. Some distance away, something it's shining on
gets warm, because of the heat energy that has shot across to it from the
light bulb and soaked into it.
-- A lightning bolt jumps from the ground to a passing cloud. Or, if you feel
more comfortable with it, a lightning bolt jumps from a cloud to the ground.
It doesn't matter. Either way, there's enough energy splashing around to
ignite houses, zap TVs and computers, melt concrete, vaporize water, and
light up a city. Although nothing is moving.
Answer:
W = 222 N.
Explanation:
The qiestion says" If the acceleration of gravity on the surface of the planet Mercury is 3.7 m / s2, then what would be the weight of a person with mass 60 kg on its surface?
"
Mass of the person, m = 60 kg
The acceleration due to gravity on the surface of gravity is 3.7 m/s²
We need to find the weight of a person on the surface of Mercury.
Weight of an object is given by :
W = mg
So,
W = 60 kg × 3.7 m/s²
W = 222 N
Hence, the person will weigh 2222 N on the surface of Moon.