Answer:
B
Explanation:
Wait for others to answer, I am not completely sure.
<u>Answer:</u>
"The poor depended on grains to survive while the wealthy enjoyed game and other exotic dishes" is the best comparison for the food available to the poor versus that which the wealthy enjoyed.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The difference of food consumed by rich and poor depends upon the specific countries but two assumptions are common among all nations that rich consume their food in more pieces and in more fancy manner than poor. Here if we discuss Romans than following could be understood:
- On an average the Rich Romans ate three meals, first meal/breakfast was called the "ientaculum". It was usually eaten around dawn, involve bread and perhaps some fruit.
- The lunch meal was called the "prandium" it was a very small meal, consumed at about 11 AM.
- The "cena" was the major meal of the day it was consumed in the afternoon.
- A porridge name, "puls," was the staple food of the poor. Puls was made by combining ground wheat and water. They might sometimes get some vegetables or fruits to consume with their pulses. Meat was consumed very rarely by them.
<span> the tactics of interest groups have never been criticized because they strictly monitored by government officials.</span>
Answer:
The level of contrast between lip color and skin tone does not affect how feminine a face is considered.
Explanation:
From the excerpt:
‘A graduate student believes that people consider faces with more contrast between lip color and skin tone as more feminine’ . This is considered as a null and alternative hypotheses.
This is because there is no relationship between how feminine a face is considered to level of contrast between lip color and skin tone and zero effects.
Answer: These responses might illustrate the SOCIAL DESIRABILITY EFFECT.
This type of Research is indicative of a self report. In self report researches, there are tendencies for participants to respond inaccurately or falsely to questions.
Social desirability effect is the tendency for an individual to Research questions in a manner or way that will be viewed in a good light by others.
Participants in this question responding a high tolerance for even the most annoying Behaviour is indicative of the Social desirability effect.