1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
3 years ago
6

The level of aggregate supply in the long-run is not affected by________. A. Changes in the capital stock. B. changes in the num

ber of workers. C. changes in the price level. D. changes in technology.
Business
1 answer:
NemiM [27]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: C. Changes in the price level

Explanation:

In the long run only change in capital, change in the amount of labour and technological changes affects the level of aggregate supply because everything in the economy is assumed to be used optimally. Therefore, on a LONG RUN price level does not affect the level of aggregate supply.

You might be interested in
The demand for salt is inelastic, and the supply of salt is elastic. The demand for caviar is elastic, and the supply of caviar
stellarik [79]

Answer:

<h2>In the case of the salt,the salt buyers would bear most of the tax burden and for caviar,the sellers would bear most of the tax burden.Hence,the correct answer is option b. or buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.</h2><h2 />

Explanation:

In the case of salt,the supply is more elastic than the demand which implies that the salt sellers are relatively more responsive to salt price change in the market.Therefore,if any tax is imposed on them,it would basically translate into higher production cost for the sellers and due to price elasticity of supply,the sellers would pass the tax to the salt consumers who are comparatively less price sensitive.Now,since the consumer demand for salt is inelastic and the consumers are relatively price insensitive,the consumers won't perhaps mind paying a higher market price for salt including the extra tax.Hence,in this instance,the tax burden would fall on the salt buyers or consumers.

On the other hand,based on the same line of argument,the tax burden would fall on the sellers of caviars as the price elasticity of caviar supply is less than that of the caviar demand.In this case,the caviar sellers are less sensitive about changes in market price of caviars and thus,won't mind paying a relatively higher production cost/expense which is inclusive of the tax burden.Due to higher price elasticity of demand or price responsiveness,the cavier consumers would be reluctant to bear the tax burden and pass it onto the sellers.

8 0
4 years ago
A policy of permitting the people of a country to buy and sell where they please, without restrictions, is called:
jeyben [28]

Answer: free trade

Explanation:

A policy of permitting the people of a country to buy and sell where they please, without restrictions, is referred to as the free trade.

Free trade allows countries interact with one another and trade the foods and services that they've.

6 0
3 years ago
Catherine had checked the price of an airline ticket in November to fly to Daytona Beach for her spring break. She was surprised
goldfiish [28.3K]
The correct answer is B. yield management
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Scenario 13-3 Ziva is an organic lettuce farmer, but she also spends part of her day as a professional organizing consultant. As
Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

c. −$80.

Explanation:

The computation of the economic profit is shown below:

Economic profit = Total revenue - Cost of seeds - Earning foregone

where,

Total sales revenue is $300

Cost of seeds is $130

And, the earning foregone is

= 10 hours × $25

= $250

So, the economic profit is

= $300 - $130 - $250

= -$80

We simply applied the above formula to determine the economic profit

5 0
3 years ago
In fiscal 2016, Microsoft Corp. reported a statutory tax rate of 35% and an effective tax rate of approximately 15%. The 2016 in
almond37 [142]

Answer:

B. $19,687 mil

Explanation:

The statutory tax rate is the percentage imposed by law; the effective tax rate is the percentage of income actually paid by an individual or a company after taking into account tax breaks (including loopholes, deductions, exemptions, credits, and preferential rates).

Now, in our question, statutory tax rate is 35%, but effective tax rate is 15%. This implies, with the help of tax breaks or loopholes, company managed to pay only 15% of its income as taxes.

This 15% of income = $2,953 mil

Hence, pretax income = 2,953/15% = $19,686.67 mil = $19,687 mil

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mondo Snow Removal's cost formula for its vehicle operating cost is $1,060 per month plus $429 per snow-day. For the month of Ja
    13·1 answer
  • Cathy uses, on her new recording drive by, the melody of a song written by earl, without earl's permission. this is
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose that there are two industries, A and B. There are five firms in industry A with sales at $5 million, $2 million, $1 mill
    13·1 answer
  • Leon Georges works in the warehouse for a manufacturer of air-purification systems. He is responsible for the transportation of
    15·1 answer
  • SONAD COMPANY Income Statement For Year Ended December 31 Sales $ 1,554,000 Cost of goods sold 761,460 Gross profit 792,540 Oper
    10·1 answer
  • Ferkil Corporation manufacturers a single product that has a selling price of $25.00 per unit. Fixed expenses total $65,000 per
    10·1 answer
  • The interest rate does not affect the intertemporal budget constraint.<br> a. True<br> b. False
    9·1 answer
  • THE IMPORTANCE OF INFORMATION IN MARKETING
    7·2 answers
  • Covan, Inc. is expected to have the following free cash​flow:
    10·1 answer
  • Agency problems are most likely to be associated with?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!